Halo 4 is better, production wise the game is a beast. But BLOPS2 also hold his ground, both game will give us gamers great value.
I'm in the 5th mission and already put 6 hours. Maybe you should try playing the game on Heroic or Legendary, if you got the skills that is, which I dont think you have since is evident you played on normal or maybe you are just a troll and you dont even have the game.
People keep saying Halo 1 (which was a great game) was a better game, but I think is not fair to compare the games. When I first played halo CE i did not know anything about the Halo Universe , everything felt so new and it has many surprises while the story unfolded.
The problem with games now days is the media, they show so much story, characters etc... before game is released that when you get to play it you already now what's going on, there is no surprises.
...
Yes it is.
I think is up there with the best. But calling it the best i think is too much.
I can see that happening! The game is that good ;)
Played a little bit last night. So far im very impressed.
Played all night last night and i can say the game is a solid 9 IMO. The only bad thing i can say about the game is that it plays very similar to other Halos, but then again I really like how the other Halos play, so i cant complain ;)
begging for attention! please dont give this joke of a website hits.
@InTheLab
as per one of the post in the forum says
"You could not add iron sight into the Halo sandbox without significantly altering the players ability to strafe/dodge/melee/grenade/jum p and start stripping the arena-shooter element away from it all. While some guns let you scope, I'm not sure that means that all guns should have some aim enhancement. The assault rifle works because it's powerful but a bit sloppy. If you give the player the ab...
Just the fact that he had to write another article to explain the first review shows how guilty this guy is and IMO it makes him loose alot of credibility.
@InTheLab
i dont know if you have played halo but adding an iron sight to Halo would destroy its gameplay completely. That is why i think this is one of the most ridiculous complaints the reviewer made.
most people are not attacking and harassing the reviewer because of the score but beacuse of the content of the review. The reviewer wrote the review based on his preferences and if you read the review he basically bashed on the game for been more like the other Halos and less like COD.
"That being said, the campaign was essentially:
1.) OMGZ!! We're under attack/have to escape/have to stop so and so.
2.) Go blow up that shield generator/push that button/ kill a bunch of dudes!
3.) Now run back through the level and kill even more of the same 8 dudes!"
really? and how is this different to COD, a game the reviewer was praising.
what do resistance and killzone have to do with this article?
great review! cant wait to play this game.
yes, but is not included in the list of publications used for the score calculation. remember that they reevaluate their list and add or delete publications several times a year. Its in their FAQ page http://www.metacritic.com/f...
but who knows maybe they'll add it.
this score wont make it to metacritic. what's the difference betweeen a 89 and a 90 anyway?
anothr great score
greatness!!!