oh no... really?...
http://i3.kym-cdn.com/photo...
It didn't have weather tough.
Took you 8 games to implement that feature?
I don't know why I keep hearing that every single E3 lol.
Honestly, I couldn't care less for a company that says they're actually trying to bring more third-party exclusives to their console. What a bunch of bastards. Preventing some gamers to play games just to boost your sales. Instead of actually trying to bring good original IP and try to make your game better than the competition.
I'll go with number 4. It's funny how people just bend over and accept pretty much anything these days. I honestly don't give a damn about 60fps, but for that kind of game, which has always been in 60fps (except the last one) to make it 30fps is just lazy.
BUT, like you said, it's literally half-price (in Canada all games are now 80$) so I have nothing to say against that.
So The Phantom Pain runs at 1080p60 and it's an "open-world" and this will run at 30fps? I can't see why the new Ratchet and Clank couldn't achieve 60fps...
@gangsta_red
Honestly, apart from Mario, I think their IP are pretty much all the same, especially Pokemon. Ironically, the only one I'd like to see is Metroid, whether if it's only a remastered or a new game, I really miss that series.
And with their huge lack of third-party games, I think they really need new IPs. I think Splatoon looks freaking awesome and it's a good step in the right direction.
"...they are not afraid to change the formula on an existing, established IP."
Without sounding douchey, what IP did they recently changed?
I would actually buy a Wii U without hesitation if they were to make a new Metroid game. Hell, even remastered. I'm actually really pissed at Nintendo to have released Metroid Fusion on 3DS exclusively to ambassadors...
For every company to confirm so many games for this year's E3, it's either gonna be a really BIG one or they're only teasing their own conference...
I'm a fan of indie games, and I aiming to develop some, but some are just shitty and are clearly only made for quick buck (and that's without mentioning the early access). With no demo or way to try them, it's only legit for gamers to have the right to be refunded.
No idea why someone would refund a game he likes, maybe because it's not worth the price? It doesn't run well on his machine? Whatever the reason, the consumers should have the right to do this....
Pretty sure Bethesda wanted to tease their own conference.
How about the PS+ version you promised months ago?
Make good games and this won't happen.
Yea I agree, I don't really know about those specific indie devs, but I know that Steam is full of shitty indie games that are made only for quick bucks.
When you're drunk at parties that is.
I've been a huge fan of the Halo series. I think it was one of the best franchise ever. Until 343 got their hands on it... Halo 4 was a freaking joke: the campaign wasn't worthy of the franchise, the script was better though, it made it more believable, but the levels, weapons and new aliens were really boring to fight. And don't even get me started on the lame multiplayer.
Halo is dead for me.
We waited a bit for it, but it's a freaking huge patch and it fixed my stuttering issue. Thank you CD Projekt Red, thank you.
Because the beta will last less than a week? Come on.
Uncharted was among the best first-party multiplayer on the PS3.
Anyone who compared The Last of Us multiplayer on PS3 and PS4 knows how this improvement can make the game ten times better.
It's a shitty practice, on both side.