funny how you say not really but then basically do the thing he says people do lol
how did i know this would mention bethesda...........
bethesda hasn't done anything good in about 10 year
thats why the comment are mostly positive.....
new as in removing new stuff?
well.....yeah i'd assume so
"I think metacritic is an objective source"
that's insane
after seeing the new pokemon game i was planning to get a switch, but i can't justify spending €330 on something with such a tiny library of games
.........
literally 6 very short lines in it says "while square enix hasn't verified the length of this dlc"
how did this blatant lie of an article get approved??
because they had a great generation and don't have as much to prove
Bethesda is great?
calling people morons for disagreeing with you and telling people to grow up in the same sentence?
"But what if it's a fun game held back for some people by the difficulty"
then you play one of the thousands of other games out there
99% of games have easy modes, so if one or 2 games don't, then play one that does
not having every game appeal to everyone defeats the purpose of games?
99% of games can be played by everyone, but you feel so entilted to change the 1% that don't?
thanks for starting it off
nobody is against easy mode or trying to remove it from gaming
some people just don't want it to be forced or for people to feel entitlded to it
thinks ubisoft is good
thinks "unique" has a c in it
sounds right
i wouldn't say thy deserve less bashing because of worse companies
just the worse companies deserve more
"creative and innovatibe" at releaing 25 assassins creed games that kinda work and insulting microtransactions
oop, sorry "time savers"
good, nice to see a few people with a bit of sense in here
hypocrisy is only there if it's the same person saying both things