Gah! And I just bought a DS not to long ago. -.-
This game brings Alan Wake to shame. Just my opinion, AW does look really good though.
Thought the list would've had more, ME was missing though...
One day perhaps I'll pick the 360 up.
I'm guilty according to 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10. haha, crap. XD
Do it!
All a matter of opinion. But w/e, congrats Bungie.
Maybe you should actually read my post next time, M O R O N.
Hmm lets think here.
Two games that have a fanbase that is enormous or one game with a small fanbase due to it's semi-decent predecessor and hesitant gamers sitting on the sideline hoping this isn't like the first one and yet won't touch it.
The amount of people that play online is pretty amazing seeing how many units KZ2 has sold so far.
Hey looky there,
your one of those morons I was talking about, thanks for proving my point.
Why the hell does every game coming out now have to have multiplayer??
Don't we already have enough?!
There are plenty of great games out there that are single player only. Thanks but no thanks guys, I like Bioshock the way it is!!
Of course it's not going to be inferior, it's a multiplat so developers have no choice but to make both look the same.
Only difference would probably be the lighting just like how it was with RE5.
Everybody can make accusations all they want about certain exclusives not being able to be done on the opposite system, it really doesn't matter seeing how those certain exclusives will not be ported over, ever.
This whole article is obsolete because GG's not going to let KZ2 be ported over to the 360 anytime soon (no point in analyzing if a game can be done if it's not even coming to the system), so the fanboys can talk all they want but in the end everyone's a freaking moron. ...
Just like when Gears will come to the PS3.
Anyway....@XDF: if you already have a PS3 then whats the fuss? Konami apparently is happy with what he's doing so leave him be.
I was always curious as to why people said this was a generic "brings nothing new to the table" shooter with pretty graphics and yet gives it such a high review score.
Must be one helluva "same ol' same ol'" shooter then I guess.
My point is that the PS3 can do 360 games better. IMO.
I'm not saying they should tweak and reconstruct every game that's ported over to the PS3, just that if they take the time they can make it so much better graphics wise.
btw, I don't believe they did what they could if the developers for NG2 were able to polish and tweak it better than the 360 version.
I'm hoping for this to possibly...probably not, but just possibly release this year so I have another reason to get a 360.
Unless it turns out to be a flop, hope not.
@GUNS: Well if it was supposedly "Genetically enhanced" then they did a shltty job. :)
Wasn't Bioshock just ported over?
If so then again there's a difference between that and actually taking the game and tweaking it to make it better than what it previously was.
Ok true about the NG being released at the same time on both consoles, but why didn't M$ tweak what they had of their finished product to make it look that much better than what it is now?
Edge=BS
Anyway, I was severely disappointed with XII so I hope they redeem themselves with XIII.
You know, the more I hear people talk about graphics are equal on both consoles, to some extent that may be true.
But it all comes down to how much is going on and how much you can do.
Being why Rage had to have some levels cut from the final product seeing how the 360 wasn't able to "handle it". It kind of stumps me cause you'd thin...