But if you can play online for free on PS3, why is the 360 still selling?
I'm guessing a lot of it comes down to which controller you use more. The more you use it the more you adjust to it and so everyone's favorite will most likely be their console of choice.
There is still the aspects of other controllers you prefer though.
I don't know what you have but these games seem real to me. I can physically hold the case and CD. I can put it into the xbox and play it. Does this not count as reality?
Your logic = D.N.E
Because they have access to your password at the time so it would be pointless trying to change it.
Don't worry, you're not going to be banned. :)
Apparently all the people who exploited the glitch to download the map pack for free will not be able to use it after the 18th of December. They referred to it as a "trial" rather than a glitch.
I agree and disagree with you there. I agree with the fact that people buy to their preference but, brand loyalty does have an effect.
Lets say you want to buy a TV. There are two of the same specifications but from two different companies. One is Sony and the other is some unheard of company. Which are you going to choose?
So the so called 'brand loyalty' does actually play a fairly big role in what the buyer wants.
Here's an example of your logic in use:
I don't like your display picture. Who would even like that, it looks ugly. Because of this, people who like that display picture have a bad taste in display pictures. Only people who don't like that have a good taste in pictures.
Kinect's primary function wasn't aimed at being used in conjunction with other games. You could say that it had it's own 'genre' of games. It's purpose was to bring in a wider range of customers because they are a business.
As for exclusives, I agree that it would be good to get more exclusives. However, I disagree with the fact that it is a major problem because sales figures do not show any sign of a visible problem. Also, I have yet to see one perso...
We can only hope. :)
Kinect is bringing them lots of $$$ so I don't see them dropping it. Sure everyone on this website somehow hates it, but people outside here like it.
If it brings them money, of course they'll do it. They are a business after all.
Although I also dislike them,
One man's rubbish is another man's treasure.
I don't think you even understand what logic is. Tell me why his comment is valid/logical. Come on, prove me wrong.
Well they were technically free...
Two days to COMPLETELY finish a map from scratch? You're dreaming bro.
Broken logic, how does a problem years ago affect the sales for this month?
Aren't businesses in it for the money? If they get more sales, they will be happy. If the casual market earns them more profit, who in the right mind will go for the opposite?
I think you need to understand what 'dominate' means.
To dominate will be very difficult because you would need to sell significantly more than competitors. An example of dominance would be like 5 million to 1 million. Figures of about 5 million to 8 million is not dominance. With this, I doubt they will be able to "dominate".
@Ezz2013
Uhh if iistuii is talking about one thing and you're talking about another, what's the point in commenting if you're going to talk about different stuff?
iistuii established the topic and you should keep to it.
To be on topic though, to me it looks like Sony is the one aiming at the casual market.