"Frame rate is 'very good'"
What does that even mean?
Yeah that scared me a bit
XV ain't innovating at all. Its just updating to a superior combat system
I like it but I like it as an extra mechanic in the game instead of just 'pick location visited'...if you know what I mean. I don't want to backtrack but I don't want it so easy that if i'm too lazy to backtrack I can just bring up a map.
Yes I am weird.
I liked Dark souls 2 version of it.
Yes thankfully.
When you've been waiting for a game for almost 10 years anything less than a year is close :/
FF versu..I mean FFXV
Is this the thing that as supposed to 'move' us?
Guess this is FFXV's version of the traditional FF music anyhow.
Edit - Aha I see NoctisPendragon. Makes sense I guess, the recent trailers have been moderately upbeat compared to what we know the games mood is supposed to be like overall(somewhat depressing). I guess the E3 trailer will show that scene where Cor is telling Noctis about his dads assassination....And, well, information regarding what...
I think the shadows look a good bit better, the rest is minimal I agree.
Tomb Raider was similar to Uncharted, The last of us was similar to the last of us Ps4.
60 FPS was VASTLY superior for both of these games. Hilarious really looking back, from a ND dev:
http://n4g.com/news/1543474...
Mass effect series was also infinitely better to play at 60 FPS. The gameplay itse...
@ CasualGamer...
Come on, they clearly knew. Why should Sony and MS pay for something when they don't need to?
It doesn't matter how 'big' a game is. Or the graphics. Its all about compression. Skyrim fit on a 9GB disk, Uncharted 3 is like 40GB. A Ps3 game. 500GB was never enough, it was mentioned and complained about etc. Sony and MS don't care and they're is no reason for them too as it doesn't affect their sales.
Mechs have been in the game since em...well, as far as we know, 2011
meh, i'd still prefer lower res and graphics for 60 myself. Either way the game is gonna be awesome though
Madness, I thought SKyrim looked below average at the time. It was okay because it was open world and all that, the graphics were never good though...imo, nice art style though
"5 Unique Features"
...Bit much. The game looks good lets not try to overhype it.
@ Battletorn, that was a mistake, you should get a 600-700 quid PC and upgrade GPU in 3-4 years. Imo. This way, your PC will last alot longer and you'll essentially have a new PC in 3-4 years for just another 200 quid. A midrange GPU 3-4 years later is a good few times more powerful. Of course, since consoles exist you won't NEED this new GPU as most games will tailor to lower end hardware, however, its nice to MAX out games that come along. I do mean MAX out btw. If any dev decides t...
I'd like it as an option, probably won't play it though..not sure, i'd like it there either way.
This is where the souls games hit the mark on the head between 'no penalty for death' and 'permadeath'. Giving a penalty for death makes you feel the annoyance of dying in a game, but perma death is too much for most people including me. Still I wouldn't mind trying it.
...Well, its an Action RPG. All actions games are infinitely better @60 FPS. Just saying...you know? Anything that requires reactions are better and more fun at higher FPS
Either way, 30FPS is grand and to be expected for big games like this on Consoles. Its no big deal, i'll be getting it on PC myself because I can. I'd be happy with the console version too though.
Edit - Haha, i'll give you an example...the witcher 2 was better at 60 than 30. So...
Wow, gotta say SE really try with their HD remakes.
Looks miles better
Well Bigcman,
It was a boring and repetitive game
abzdinne
We know as much about the new X as FFXV, we know alot now...like...what more do we need to know other than play the demo ourselves??
I'll make sure to play both of these games anyhow