It deserves a PC version, even if it still uses last-gen graphics. I have it on both PS3 and X360 but I can't stomach how blurry it is on either.
In before the idiotic pos... oh. Maybe next time.
Skyrim has decent support. On my modded game, without SLI, I'm lucky to get 40FPS. Once SLI is enabled it's great.
Fallout 4... not so much.
Why would anyone expect dinosaurs? There weren't any in Far Cry 4, so there's nothing like them to reskin and put into this new game like they did with most other things.
Nice.
In some aspects, like monster fighting, it feels better than TW3. The writing and dialogue read as if things were lost in translation, it's pretty bad. But other than that, it's a pretty amazing game, especially when you consider that it's a last gen title.
It depends on whether they could keep it moddable. I couldn't imagine being stuck with vanilla versions of their games.
What made Resident Evil great ceased to exist after RE4.
And how can any respectable RE fan place RE6 above RE5? RE6 was terrible, and not just as a RE game.
Considering how much the performance sucks in built up areas of FO4, I wouldn't hope for a NYC, not unless the place had been totally leveled :/
I didn't suggest that all early access titles run poorly when they're finished.
People who claim this game runs like crap are stating a fact. People bleating the old "it's early access!" again and again are stating what we already know, and it carries no assurance that things will get any better. You only need to look at the history of early access games to see how many games, like this one, never really improve. I'm betting it won't, based on a ...
Heh.
"Buh-buh-but It's early access!"
Guess what? ARMA 3 was in early access at one point. How much did that improve frame rates upon release? People are quick to defend it because it's marked 'early access', but I can tell you (as someone who buys more early access games than retail games these days), it means fuck-all. Especially when performance hasn't changed AT ALL in the 6 months I've had it on my GTX980SLI rig.
...
Well, it's 2016 isn't it. Most modern 'gamers' can't accept a challenge in any way, shape, or form.
Their idea of a good time includes all the wonderful modern mechanics that we would have called 'cheats' in the past.
Can we get an achievement for obtaining a playable frame rate?
I don't want the game (yet), especially not on PS4, but I can't pass up that statue. There's only ever been one other decent Hitman statue, and at this point it's way too expensive to buy.
Ubisoft fucking up yet another series by reskinning the same thing over and over.
They couldn't even stick to the survival part. It still looks like you're able to be a god and control everything. But that's what I get for expecting an actual survival game from Ubisoft.
'True to the Franchise'
Haha
They shouldn't have opened the article with that, because it's where I immediately stopped reading it.
Did I mention I don't like heights.
It never said they were active, it said they were concurrently online.
I know people have to shit on everything, I do it too sometimes, but c'mon.
@_-EDMIX-_
Yeah... no.
First of all, CDPR have released ~10 patches for TW3 since it was released, and they're still actively fixing the game.
How many did Ubisoft release for Unity before they utterly abandoned it?
Second of all, TW3 and AC:U are nowhere near the same. The complexity, open world and variety of things to do in TW3 GREATLY outweighs that found in ACU or any other Assassin's Creed title. And yes, points...
Let's check those reviews against older ones:
Game informer
ACU 8/10
ACS 9/10
Gamespot
ACU 7/10
ACS 9/10
IGN
ACU 7.8
ACS 8.2
Godisageek
ACU 8.0
ACS 9/10
XGN
ACU 8/10
ACS 9/10
Gamepro
ACU 83
ACS 87
Post arcade
ACU 8/10
ACS 8.5/10
PCgames.de
Agreed. And the AI still yell out dumb shit, constantly giving away their location in the process.
Where's the recoil like in Blood Money as well? It looks way too easy.