Yes, the Wii is a failure in terms of 3rd party support because of its positioning.
>> A second screen would actually keep you immersed in the game. No need to bring up a menu on your TV for a map or inventory/skill management, plus utilizing those things would be immensely more intuitive with touch inputs
Why don't you reserve your judgment for when you actually play some Wii U games?
Agreed. I don't need some stupid "innovations" like Move, or Kinect or this WiiU GamePad. I just want to play cool games like Chrono Cross the way I used to. I don't need this dual screen shit.
Where is the damn connection between that?
Nothing can save Vita. Sony is almost dead. Say somtheing new, dammit. I'm feeling sick of this repetitive shit.
Lolwut? Where is the connection between the Wii U gamepad and the Wii software? О_О
I just laughed so hard, so sorry... -.-
>> instead of copying nintendos <<
Dual-screen gameplay is not a Nintendo invention. Just stop putting Nintendo everywhere, it's embarrassing.
>> its just an option put there for those able to use it. it wont sell hardware <<
So? This logic applies to the Wii U. It is just a feature, not a hardware selling point.
I don't know about JRPGs, but GamingBolt need to die, that's for sure. This article is so stupid, I don't know how I finished reading it.
What is T5 Labs anyway? And why they took so long?
Absolutely right.
Another cute Vita title :3
P.S. Haters of games with busty girls are very funny.
No, we need a platform for a decade, not a year. Wired knows nothing about video game industry. Look at the Wii. While the PS3 is still alive and supported by developers, the Wii is dead for a year. What we gamers have from such sprint? Nothing except need to spend 300 dollars for a new console.
And that is why I don't like Nintendo.
And Aksys Games ;)
Do not forget NIS ;)
Ronald McDonald is a maskot of McDonald's, Kevin Butler is not a maskot of Sony.
What? Where is the connection between Kevin Butler and the PlayStation brand?
Wow, just wow <3