Review scores need to go? No, Metacritic (you know the site every gamer likes to reference) needs quality control. Reviews with lil substance and absurd criticisms for the soul purpose of getting views should not be counted. Well that's just my opinion
Yeah man, I'll agree I believed it for about a minute but now I'm extremely skeptical about this. Like you said it doesn't seem legit, I'd wait for more news before we get all excited.
But... HALO HAS CHANGED! Ask any Halo fan that was around every time they revealed new info. To say Halo hasn't changed is ignorant. Problem is some reviewers don't like what makes Halo, Halo. I'm not even going to get into detail since people would just say "IT'S HIS OPINION", no fucking shit and my opinion is that his opinion sucks. IMO LMAO
this game aint got nuttin on train simulator
Too much backtracking IMO, Halo 3 has to be my favorite. Awesome campaign, amazing multiplayer, and great forge (at the time). All the Halos are quite good imo
Did you really call me a Sony drone for stating a fact? I said both games were good. Funny thing is my preferred console is Xbox 360 LMAO
I think this game alone sold more than the entire Forza sires. lol Both good games :D
Rayan, why do you obsess over bad Halo reviews? Just curious. Anyways I think this has to do with all the traffic EGM got after their review. Everybody wants those AD dollars now, especially Q2Three.
Great deal for Wii owners or even people buying the Wii U! Snatch it up while it lasts!
I'm not saying that the review is biased because he doesn't agree with me (I don't even have an opinion on the game yet), I'm saying that because the reasons he has are just ridiculous, expecting iron sights in Halo and other things is like expecting Mario to have speedy gameplay like Sonic. Halo has already implemented modern things like the ability to sprint and to have custom classes but he wants Halo to not even be Halo anymore. The grade itself (7/10) isn't even the b...
No, I support personal opinion but professional reviews shouldn't be biased. Not every reviewer is biased, case in point, I'm not.
This reviewer is incredibly biased and wants Halo to be a COD clone with a Halo skin. I'm not saying this because I'm a Halo fan, I saying this because it is blatantly apparent by this man's review. EGM should honestly fire this guy or at least delete the review and have someone who isn't biased review the game. Here's a lil quote that made me laugh.
"These low points are openly exacerbated by the series’ staunch refusal to get with the times when it comes to ...
Damn, I might actually get a vita now...
Do we really need confirming anymore? It's common sense, every gamer knows it's coming.
Do we really need confirming anymore? It's common sense, every gamer knows it's coming.
Do we really need confirming anymore? It's common sense, every gamer knows it's coming.
This is how normal people prove a point.
It is simple, fun, and free. Not to mention it was based off of a popular meme.
God damn Sony loves HD collection, but the prices are soo good! I want to get em all! Well maybe not the Killzone one...
That's a fair score for halo though I can't actually read the review to see how well their opinion is stated. What did Famitsu give the other Halos?