You buy the overpriced HDD, then the pointlessly charged for LIVE service, then the overpriced wireless adapter, then the play-n-charge kits........what's freaking next?!
Shouldn't the gold members NOT have ads and the non-gold members HAVE ads....and both get to access Multiplayer?
I think THAT would be a better system.
At this point, I can only assume you're a hilarious spoof of PS3-haters, and if that's the case, you're genius.....but kinda sad.
Please actually read the blog before commenting. I know most of you are already making up your minds when you read the title. I bring up some very valid points on why IW/Activision don't deserve your hard earned cash on this game, but it's not like I can stop you. Now quit being so hateful towards a human being because it upsets you that they are pointing out some problems with your favorite game series.
Also:
#6: The tech has gone unaltered - Console versions are stuck ...
And you're rated "BO" for "Belongs in the Open zone"
But I can't believe they put Halo 3's opening on here.
I'm not commenting on the game in general, I'm just saying, the Halo 3 opening was nothing special.
Anyone who disputes so is a fanboy.
And PC is always going to look better than the console ones because you can turn up the settings on the resolution and AA.
Reviewers will give ANY game a perfect score if the words "Call of Duty" or "Halo" are on the cover.
Even if the game is less than 5 hours long and mostly just a regurgitation.
Bcause usin teh n00bz toobs on teh Muliplayr make it teh worths itz!
That's because it's 'ACTIVISION Blizzard' now.
MW2 isn't even worth picking up.
http://n4g.com/up/72634/Blo...
Bad Company was great. The characters were likable, you had more options as to how you went about your mission, and the multiplayer was more opened up (The maps didn't feel claustrophobic).
First of all, you're ignorant to generalize PC gamers as pirates.
Secondly, I think this is one of the few, and perhaps ONLY, game I have EVER heard of that has a mission REQUIRING you to kill innocent, unarmed civilians. It's not your run-of-the-mill kill the terrorists/aliens/creatures/Ba stards/etc gun scene. It's a twisted scene in which you ARE the terrorist and you SLAUGHTER innocent civilians.
Now THAT should at least give you pause.
Some people....GASP!......
It's annoying, yes.
"ZOMG ARE YOUH TEH JACK TOMSTON?!??"
"ZOMG ITS THE WARTGAME! OH *COURSE* A MISSION REQUIRES YOU TO SLAWTER INOCENT CIVILIANS!"
"WHO CARES ABOUT PC?! IM BYING IT ON TEH XBAUX!"
....sigh.
...That's not really what I'm saying...
"COD4 never had 64 players online"
PC version.
"The first two reason are irrelevant to console gamers"
The console community should care about their gaming brethren on the PC.
"The World at War Effect? That's stretching it if you ask me. The explanation is stupid not even a reason"
How is the game recycling scenes with slightly changed settings NOT a reason?
"You kill civilians in GTA IV and many other...
I suppose it's easier to downplay the load of PS3 exclusives than to list Xbox 360 exclusives.
I remember when LIVE crashed in EARLY 2008 from COD4.
Such a waste of $50 a year.
Nothing to see here, folks.
And won't work well EVER.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum...
Sorry, Activision, but I don't buy games from companies that disregard their customers.
....and then the GOLD members could also access the Facebook/twitter/Netflix/party chat/etc stuff as well.
Sigh....but I think we all know it's not going to happen any time soon. Microsoft isn't going to give us the multiplayer that we get on PC/PS3 for free when they know the sole reason so many people pay for gold is just for it.