These xbox heads keep defending what microsoft did with milo by just saying "lol at ps3 fanboys who are jealous of natal". Nobody is saying natal won't be good, they are just disgusted at microsoft for the milo trailer in which they said "it is real and it works today".
Who apparently "couldn't see" the big flaws in that trailer yesterday, why are you still defending milo? They wouldn't have faked the trailer if it was working, and they wouldn't have asked the "select few"(shows their reluctance to show it live) to only ask it certain questions, meaning it can recognize basic speech tones. I'm still impressed with natal, but milo is clearly nowhere near a working state and they pretended that it works, which is very underhanded.
It is a story you mould, and they are two distinctly different things. I can see the fun coming from panic at almost dying, but then huge relief if you escape at the final opportunity, can't wait for this game!
You never admit microsoft is at fault what is with you guys! Look at the fukin thing, the tv clearly moves before her, and even if your messed up brainwashed desperate head can't see that, her(real) right hand is up against her chest, while her tv hand is down at her side while she is busy mistiming the hand movement. (I suppose you can't see that either huh?) You are absolutely ridiculous and both of these faults are PROOF.
It is FAKED, get over it! And what do you mean jealous?...
Nope. To downplay milo is to downplay a game.To downplay halo does not downplay the 360's potential. To downplay shrek:the game, does not downplay the 360.
It's nice to take a journalists word for it. But look at the video and see that her hand moves on the tv before her real hand. Therefore the trailer is faked.
But we also have journalists saying it works. This means that it does work, but it isn't far enough along to impress anyone yet(most likely doesn't hold conversations yet, just answers questions you ask, or comments on your tone of voice), so microsoft made a fake trailer. Occam's razor.
You are trying to explain it in a way...
Her hand moved on the tv before her real hand. The trailer was faked. Get over it. I have received many pms from 360 fanboys too, and you don't see me highlighting them and acting all oppressed.
This trailer was of claire in front of a video to make a big statement on what they want it to be. Behind doors it was probably done for real, but it was done in front of people who would understand any bugs that weren't ironed out yet. For the general public though, they wanted to leave an impression, and they did. With a lie. "This works, and it works today." The stuff in that trailer was faked.
Edit: You go on about sdf but you guys are doing it too. Admit that vide...
Acting in front of a video. They didn't have much for e3 and had to make an elaborate hoax. It might end up working, but this footage was faked. Her hand on the tv moved before her real hand. There is no other way that can happen unless it was a video.
The ps3 already had all of those websites. The ps3 has a motion detecting camera. They only had 2 or 3 exclusives while sony had 10 or so absolutely top quality exclusives.
I don't understand why someone can write such a biased article. Anyone without bias would say sony had more exclusives/better exclusives.
They would also say natal is miles off and what microsoft showed could easily be staged, and really wasn't that impressive. The final games might be impressive using natal,...
It can only tell if you are excited/sad/etc, and respond appropriately.
"I am going RACING!!!"
Would probably get a response like
"Racing? Sounds fun!"
It's for kids, as I don't think adults will be taken in by it.
Natal won't be for years and even then it probably won't work.
That it was actually worth more than we paid for it, but there is no way that that thing is worth £229, it doesn't even have a umd drive
I was looking forward to it and everything >|
I just actually don't understand the difference between natal and the playstation eye, could someone explain it to me?
It just seems more advanced than the playstation eye but I can't actually see the difference and people are saying it is revolutionary and never done before, I want to get on the hype wagon!
Edit: I think I get it now, this can be used inside any game? Like if I was playing dragon ball I could punch and kick my way to victory without a first person ...
Am I expected to believe Nintendo when they say it works? Trick me once...
He means the concept has already existed. This is just an improved version, but people are acting like it has never been seen before.
But Nintendo won't touch that with a ten foot pole.
But when I sent my ps3 back to sony(aunty spilt water in the top of it...) I had to source my own box(at least they gave me back a refurbished one since it wasn't a manufacturing fault), how does sony america do it?