Good for you, Im glad i didnt!
@nukeitall
Why are ARM processors known to choke a lot?
Also, i know this may be a little bit off topic, but does the Cell run at 3.2Ghz or 3Ghz? cuz i thought it was 3.2ghz but know im starting to wonder. And the even bigger question for me is, does the GPU run at 550Mhz or 500Mhz and GDDR3 run at 700Mhz or 650Mhz?
why didnt they build it in like everybody else does? because they are f-ing cheap! f-ing Nintendo, just like them to always skimp, they are always more worried about saving money/making money for themselves than hooking the consumer up.
Wow, the level of ignorance coming out of you is unbelievable, the GC was not 2 times more powerful than the ps2. And the GC could not produce more polygns than the ps2. Also the GC had a Tranform and Lighting engine which was the precursor to Shaders and was not programmable. Whereas the Xbox had shaders and could do 8 textures per pass. The GC was nowhere near the Xbox's performance level. The Xbox would produce bump mapping and specular highlighting on nearly all their games, whereas t...
Like yourself, we are not talking about some new microprocessor design that doesnt need to run at as high a frequency in order to outperform older designs. We are talkin about a really old design that came out in 1997 as a PowerpC 750. Thereis nothing modern or high tech about the WiiU's cpu
Your point is retarded, cuz the ps1/ps2 had much better specs for their gen than the wii u has for its. Its a next gen consoles, with current gen specs
Bull, i dont buy it, its all inferior tech. And dont even mention the "mystical" gpgpu to me, that run at 550mhz and has a bandwidth of 12GBps, cuz it aint so
So instead act like its alright? Yeah, thats whats gonna get Nintendo to change it. No, complaining about it, is the only thing that'll get Nintendo to change it. And defending this is fanboyish.
So the framerates are lower on this and BLOPS II. Pathetic, this system just cant hang. Tekken Tag is next. Poor Wii U fanboys are in such denial
;-)
I could be wrong and it could be "bloom" but either way it takes more processing (btw hdr is superior to bloom)
but its not even a little bit better, its worst. Its runs at a lower framerate than the 360/ps3 version and has less graphical effects. Thats pathetic! The system is a architectural mess/let down
"i like the wii u version better, cause the lighting on the mounted gun at the begining of the vid"
thats because its missing that lighting effect, technically that is inferior, its called hdr, look it up, it takes more processing
why are you referring people to this article when all it does is prove that the wiiu version isnt performing as well? Its got a lower framerate than even the Ps3 version. A lower framerate like this points to the lower bandwidth
While they may look close in this comparison, the fact is the 360 version has more effects going on (like HDR) and a higher framerate. The WiiU may be "next-gen" to you silly WiiU fanboys, but its performance level is more or less current gen level, for a higher price.
"People see what they want to see I guess"
You're seeing what you wanna see
You're kidding right? please tell me you're kidding. You better take off those WiiU fanboy goggles cuz they are making you look dumb. But the PC version runs at 1080 w/8xAA&FXAA, 16xAF@60fps, without even breaking a sweat!
The WiiU is pathetic, sorry, but aint no fanboyism in the world gonna make me think otherwise. And its overpriced and the controller is a gimmick
hey guys, dont know if its just me, but it seems faster and therefore smoother to me after the update, check it out and tell me what youse think
You dont get it, this means that it will be harder for them to get good framerates with good graphics out of it, because of this bottleneck, it is performing slower than the current gen
Think of it like this RAM is its capacity (so think of RAM as a water tank), whereas bandwidth is like the size of the hose you gonna use to fill that water tank with. The Wii has a bigger water tank, 1GB (the other gig is for OS), whereas the other systems have a 512MB water tank. But the hose to fill the the Wii's tank with is 17" in diameter whereas the current gens hose is 25+" in diameter. So you can fill the current gens tank faster than you can fill the Wii's, therefo...
Dont care if crap sells, its still crap, current-gen graphics with oversized gimmicky controller and portable with no 2nd analog stick and inferior grahics equals crap in my book. And all of Nintendo's franchises are 20/30yrs old franchises. I dont care how well Justin Beiber sells, he still sucks in my book!