Jesus, did you even READ the article?
He says it's only something he notice, not that he was bashing it.
U-n-d-e-r-a-p-p-r-e-c-i-a-t-e- d.
But that is still irrelevant to my original post: The attach ratio is more accurate than number of copies sold.
What? Let's say Guy A wants GTA4. How does a larger/smaller library affect this?
"hundreds more games/choices"
>_________________________ _________________________>
"It should be obvious that a film is a film and a game is a game. Claiming that both are one and the same would be foolish. "
Mr. Kojima disagrees...
God of War 2 is not a Jaffe game. Who are you telling to do research?
Only because of the larger install base. Look at the number of copies sold divided by the install base (Example - copies sold for PS3:total PS3s) to get an accurate view of which would sell better if they had the same install base.
They need to prioritize SP first and MP slightly behind (although they still need to put a lot of effort since this would be the God of War with MP).
Indeed. I don't think you can justify a 4/5 for this game (since I don't think they go by .5's).
Do you mean retardedly?
I'm sick of hearing this. It is not trouble for the two other handheld consoles. Want to know why? BECAUSE NOBODY BUYS THE IPHONE JUST FOR THE GAMES. Games are SECONDARY on the iPhone and this is completely obvious.
Rest in Peace.
Different people have different eyes. It's all in your genes.
Please stop with the lame ad hominem attacks, they are getting old.
The general consensus here is that your article is poorly written without a general check of facts and absolutely zero knowledge of any other FPS besides Halo.
Also, your 'i r3lly ment c0nso1e$!!!1111?1!1shift+1' is poor and transparent.
You stole the words from my mouth, almost exactly.
Bubbles for you, we think alike.
Also, I totally fell out of my chair laughing when I read hydro-lx's post, specifically this:
"but how many of them were actually popular?"
and
"they realized it like in 2002 or something..."
I can't imagine Capcom doing that (or anyone else for that matter, except maybe Criterion)
Imagine a guy walking into a store looking for the game.
"Hello. I'm looking for AaaaaAAaaaAAAaaAAAAaAAAAA!!!''
"Yes, right this way."
/shoppers staring at you like you're crazy
That's like saying a car's tire went flat but you can still continue for 20 miles on it. It (the tire) is broken, not repaired.
A good journalist knows how to review a game without letting the hype affect him, so there would be no need for a review this late.
Then what was the point you were making? He clearly said it was just something he found.