@Bounkass Rockstar could easily do this... its just that it is taxing on your rig and they don't want to alienate alot of potential buyers of the game with medium setup
@BeastlyRig I know that image looks insane
If they drop the realistic feel of GTA IV i might as well get Saints Row 3 because thats what i liked the most.
Silly me i'm PS plus hense i'll be getting it for $5 dwl can't wait :-)
I'm gonna buy Shank for $7 which is a good deal i missed the $5 deal which ended last week i think
Who ever wrote this article lacks understanding and totally misunderstood everything that the tweet said. With that said! Its actually the other with around with the single player having the more realistic animation and the multiplayer having the quicker death animation etc.
Ifs its filled with action and suspense like the National Treasure movies then it can't go bad :-)
Its not lag. Its just that he wasn't close enough and you don't get the level of unrealistic lunge that you get in MW games.
Its simply better in everything and i bet the story will be alot better too!
I think its a good idea for them implementing the online pass. Its better the publisher than GameStop ripping me off!
Wow, i couldn't of said it better myself!
Well, everyone is entitled to their own opinion but personally GTA IV is pure awesome and its the type of game that even after completion you can still have alot of fun in the city...which in fact still is the most immersive city in gaming.
GTA IV is one of my favorite games and it also offers alot of bang for your buck. The story mode alone is over 30 hours long and there's even a Trophy/Achievement if you complete it under the 30 hour mark. Also, the side missions will put this game over a 100+ so if there is a game that could be well worth over $100 its GTA IV.
I wanted to buy Shank as i saw it for $4.99 last night and its $9.99 today what the heck :-(
Sony needs to release the PS4 before Microsoft releases the Xbox360's successor. What i'm saying is whoever does first is more likely to succeed if they're after the same audience.
Nope, it was the PC fanboys pretending to be PS3 gamers that was bashing it. With that said, the PS3 version surpassed my expectations knowing what the PS3 hardware is capable of. DICE worked its magic on utilizing the SPU's and it definitely paid off. Oh, and the best thing about that is that they said its gonna look even better than what was shown on the Jimmy Fallon show :-)
The guys over @ IGN are some of the biggest fanboys. I don't ever count their reviews as reliable anymore :-(
Battlefield 3 isn't anything like COD. Well, the only thing they have in common is them being both a first person shooter.
Your comment alone is a better read than these COD vs BF3 articles. I didn't even click the link :-)
Personally, i can't tell the difference between 30fps and 60fps. The only time i can tell when the frames has drop tremendously is when it dips below 20fps. Therefore, the fact that DICE went for 30fps per second and a whole lot of visual eye candy is better for me.