What does the future hold for Xbox One? Greatness Awaits
That is all.
I really don't get why the decided not to release a demo. Especially now, after the mess of broken games we saw in 2014. IMO releasing a demo shows the devs trust in their product.
I agree with the writer, the video sold it, not sure if the game is actually worth its praise. Will reserve final opinion until we've played it
@Inception, "tons of articles that downplay The Order" Since I am the editor of that site, I think I should know. Where are these "tons" you speak of?
When the news of the 5hour length broke, we were one of few that said it's longer than 5 actually, and not the real issue. WE defended The Order on the one hand, and raised a few questions regarding overall quality - which we said people should only judge AFTER release.
So stop talking ...
Is it a requirement that every writer must say exactly the same thing, have the same opinions?
Also, "tons of bad things', you need to do proper research. Before all this shit started, the site warned that negativity is premature.
http://www.mweb.co.za/games...
It's a worthy debate, don't read if you don't want to.
Horrid and distasteful, yet funny
I think both sides have merit, Ready at Dawn as well as critics/gamers. But yes, it's time to step back and wait for the full release
It is a valid concern, I agree, but we'll just have to face it as it comes. eSports needs the big takers
That's some impressive numbers. I hope major corporations flock to use eSports as investment houses.
With that I agree, but also, let's wait for the final verdict once the game is released
But why? Surely it's not just petty jealousy or PS4 hate? Are we that immature?
I have to agree, it is uncanny how much negative press The Order:1886 got, like right from the start, when we first saw it at E3 2013, and it didn't stop.
Anyone understand why?
I agree an all three. Just think how much rage would be avoided if gamers follow just one of these points. Don't pre-order games, period.
The other 2 points are also sensible, the world will be a better place if we follow it.
Spot on, but what determines value for money?
I disagree, there are valid concerns, people should just wait before they pre-order to hear from proper reviewers. It might all be a storm in a teacup, but better safe than sorry.
Calm down and talk like a grown up won't you. The article defends the playtime, raises valid concerns between game cost to value, and still say wait for the final game before you make a verdict.
So what's the problem?
I agree, the playtime is not that short, and shouldn't justify not buying it. My concern, however, is about overall quality compared to price, and I think it is unbalanced. But, on the other hand, as the article states, let's wait to see proper reviews.
I agree, and it's not really 5 hours, closer to 10, as the article explains. But still, the argument is not so much about the game time than it's about value for money.
I also found that interesting. What we expect from today's fps games differ from what we expected a few years ago. We want more, even though it's a FPS game, where story is kinda in the background.