I want to say muscle, but I don't know enough about cars.
Completely different games, and BO3 didn't have the bugs this one has.
Because come on, it's a new gen, new consoles, they had a massive budget, and they still stick with the same, buggy engine. They deserve to lose points for bugs.
Here's my take. The people who buy CoD every year and then complain about it deserve to have a "bad" game. But this is my first CoD since MW2, and , having played the past 3 at friend's places, this is the first actual good CoD since MW2 or BO1.
In terms of content, it's insane, and the huge huge numbers it's pulled in show that people online aren't the majority here.
Only on PC.
There's nothing wrong with that is there?
In what way? Hardline was a disappointment, I'd take this over Hardline any day. BF4 however, is great, but I wouldn't compare it to CoD, they're completely different games.
@Rookie
Gamespot is not one person. They have multiple reviewers.
These comment sections are such a joke now.
LMAO how are you guys arguing which is better from 2 completely different games?
Come on guys, let's not be this blinded.
How so?
In terms of value for money, this year's CoD beats out most games released this year. The PC port is incredibly solid, and they've managed to innovate a bit, while still catering to their main audience.
@Julietlewis
Don't kid yourself, Halo is in the same place as CoD right now, it hasn't had that top-tier MP since Halo 3.
There's so much content in this game that you can't really go wrong. 2 campaign modes, both with co-op, zombies, top down zombie minigame, a solid multiplayer, and the freerunning mode.
In terms of value for money, it's pretty solid.
I haven't enjoyed CoD since MW1 and MW2, and I find this really enjoyable.
I can understand people not liking it if they've bought every CoD every year, but that's another problem.
All they did was review the single player campaign. Obviously it's not the main part of the game, and there's still co-op for the campaign which would make it a lot funner.
A long one. Like 3-4 years.
It's like Helldivers.
2edgy4me^
It's funny how that's not ok, but games about WW1 and WW2, all the other countless wars, civilians dying in Afghanistan in CoD etc are all ok?
Like come on, if we're going to worry about insulting everyone and censoring media over it, we might as well end up in Fahrenheit 451.
I dunno, I see something here. This is what VR can accomplish. We can be able to experience history as if we were actually there.
It's not to everyone's taste, but it has its potential.
Nah it's just obsolete in 6 months, when they release the S version. Meanwhile, you can root your Android phone to run any custom rom, most of which drastically improve performance and battery life.
Specswise, even $500 Android phones have higher or equivalent specs to the $1200 iPhone.