That was the point. If they shown their name, then people would shit on it before even giving it a chance.
Nah, COD didn't show their name in the beginning of the gameplay trailer, because faggot haters would've shat on it before they even gotten a chance. Now it seems alot of people changed their minds.
MS decided to make two consoles and have only 2 decent 1st party games to show in their conference, whilst Sony just done what people actually really wanted, games. Mate, they even had a bloody orchestra, these guys are badass! Also gotta give it too UBI, they shown some really great games (FOR HONOR, Steep, Watch Dogs 2.)
I see no point in getting this. Having a Win 10 PC means I can play basically every Xbox exclusive, and I have a PS4 so best of both worlds.
Last year was for me. The amount of fucking megatons was mental, and I'm guessing we'll never see that amount again.
2017 is 6 months away, and 2016 has been an amazing year for games.
More like forced to show their 'solidarity'.
I played Xbox once, fucking hated the wonky left analog.
You see, price is where Sony never fails in, thats why I don't think PS NEO is gonna follow in MS footsteps. Xbox can have all the power in the world, but in the end games matter more. IMO, they should have sticked to XB S and focused more on new IP's.
EDIT: forgot the fat PS3's price tag back in 2006-07, mistake.
This conference was just dead too me. I was watching Peaky Blinders and I thought I should watch this; I don't think I'll ever watch a MS E3 conference again. I'll wait for the trailers next time
The Xbox was more powerful than PS2. Power doesn't mean everything.
@Yetter games that fucking release your inner hype.
what fucking great games? I expected Forza as much as anyone would, and Gears was already expected too. MS was shit this year.
Currently this E3 day 2 has been shiet besides Steep, For Honor & Watch Dogs. Ubisoft had it's cringe, but it was better than MS. MS only had consoles to show off; their first party games that were actually good were Forza and Gears, the rest were shit. I just hope Sony can actually make me hype.
Microsoft are jumping a generation. Yeah sure, this is gonna be the most powerful console, but what games are going to show how powerful it is? Lol, if the thing can run 4k on any game, then the price is gonna be well over 500 quid. Also, I don't see Sony following the same path as Microsoft. PS slims are usually cheaper than the previous model, and I assume PS4 neo is just a slim with 4k videos and a smoother experience.
TF2 was 35 quid when I bought it; it only had 9 characters and 6 maps. Overwatch doesn't feel like a F2P game, if it were then it would've died within a month. Fucking pay to win is cancer; you'd have to pay for characters like tracer for like 2-5 quid. The game is worth £40, I played the beta for a good 20hrs and I still wanted more. Jeez, you say it's hollow compared to TF2, TF2 got better by the years just like how OW is going too. The £40 price tag is fucking jus...
@Dario_DC because if they made if F2P, you'd have to pay for each character, or play 40hrs to earn 1. Btw, if there was a progression system, the game would be shit. TF2 doesn't even have a fucking progression system, because it don't work.
I love how people disagree and don't even try proving my point wrong. Micro-transactions are for people who are impatient or for people who actually enjoy opening packs. You say it ruins the game when it actually doesn't, I think if they didn't put in micro-transactions then it would've ruined it for people who actually enjoy opening packs (like youtubers or people who are obsessed with getting items.) This doesn't effect you lot who hate micro-transations; even if it wasn...
If you're a sick tracer player, then the pulse bomb can used amazingly.
Imo, MS ruined Xbox by putting their exclusives on PC. Xbox doesn't have that much exclusivity because of this.