Garnett

Member
CRank: 5Score: 8350

LOL Scared already? So your saying that PS3 in 3rd place is a GOOD thing?

What ever helps you sleep at night...

5668d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

The only thing i heard about MOVE, is that most games will require 2 move-chucks (lol) which is false. I didnt hear anything else like that, nor did i see articles. So please link me.

People were saying Kinect wont work if you sit down, which is false because it will work.

The openfield thing was a reference to the 6ft of room,which more people have, but most people claim they dont have enough room (only on N4G).

5668d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well since your going by sales, EVERY ps3 exclusive has flopped compared to Halo/Gears series. Aww too soon?

5668d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

You can post what ever you want on N4G, and you will still be an idiot. Lol

5668d ago 20 agree7 disagreeView comment

WHAT THE HELL!!

Ok...MS.... Seriously...

Sony screwed up at the start of this gen, and now MS is screwing up at the end of it.. SONY LEARNED FROM THEIR MISTAKES, YOU SHOULD NOT ABANDON THE CURRENT DESIGN.

If this is true,and Kinect does sell for $150, then i do Hope PS3 over takes 360, because MS is trying to kill the 360.

/Rant

5668d ago 2 agree10 disagreeView comment

Mandatory or not, your paying.

You can make your self feel better by saying you get discounts on rented games, but your still paying.

5669d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

REMEMBER? You cant be black (not), you cant sit down while using Kinect (not true), Kinect is very laggy and not precise (not true) and you got to be in a open field to play (not true).

Kinect (if it was lower priced) would be coming for first place Nintendo, but Sony is gonna have the better, cheaper motion control.

5669d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

It just shows how stupid people are, im not gonna buy no arcade game (unless its like Battlefield 1943) for $15. That $15 could be used on something else like DLC for my favorite game, or even 2 better arcade games.

5669d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

That is good, yet a problem. Sony wont know how to market all these features, so they will end up like Six Axis (Rarely used).

Though personally, i think MOVE will be great for Hardcore gamers, but casual games i dont know the price of PS3 is a little high, same with Kinect.

5669d ago 2 agree6 disagreeView comment

I dont mind paying for one online portion, but im not paying it for every game.

5669d ago 0 agree5 disagreeView comment

You do know that are people on PSN who pay for "Plus" (which is a rental service) and fake pants for their home avatar right? LOL

Both systems are so much alike, you cant troll one without the other.

You feel stupid? You should..

5669d ago 1 agree6 disagreeView comment

Its not like American soldiers just "No Russian" iraq daily, if the coward Al-Qaeda soldiers would wear a uniform and fight like real soldiers (not behind innoncent people) then im sure civilian deaths would be down.

5669d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

I support this.

No other game has you playing as real terrorist, you play some a Russian with a ski mask (who resembles Al-Qaeda) but never the real thing. This is actually innovative, yet not so much.

As long as it doesn't have Anti-American slogans ill be sure to play it and have fun.

5669d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Medal of Duty: Bad Company 2 is getting over hyped by DICE fanboys, DICE cant even fix their own game, let alone make a good multiplayer portion of another game.

5669d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

@Sarevok

Except its multiplatform, and more people play it on 360.

The PS3 just isn't good for FPS.

5669d ago 1 agree5 disagreeView comment

It had nothing to do with the time it came out, it was about the PS2 level gameplay.

Quality> Quantity

But i respect the developers, they are the only consoles developers to try 256 players on the hardest console to develop for.

5669d ago 7 agree11 disagreeView comment

By next year Sony could cut the price of the PS3 by another $50-100, so the 360 price cut isn't gonna be that effective.

5669d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Who told you MS never lost money on the 360? MS lost LOTS of money on the 360, they are just now (like Sony) starting to make money on the current consoles.

5669d ago 2 agree4 disagreeView comment

1. Lets see it could be because they wanted to use the superior Xbox Live network? Or it could be because they wanted to test the 360 which no other developer has done, or it could be because they KNOW their game will sell well on Xbox. These are just some reason, there are many more...

2. Your saying a shoot game would sell better on PS3? You know your wrong if you say yes, they dont call Xbox "shooterbox" for no reason. Look at the disappointing sales of Killzone ...

5669d ago 1 agree8 disagreeView comment

1. where does it say MS paid them?

2. even if MS did so what? Sony does the same thing with namco...

5670d ago 5 agree13 disagreeView comment