Um, ok. What about it?
I'm actually not too fond of the new sniper rifle. All the other guns look terrific, but then this redesign comes along. For one, the two arcs around the reticule when zoomed in are a distraction and extraneous. The design really doesn't fit with the Halo universe. We're supposed to be very far into the future, yet this gun looks archaic and old-tech with wires sticking out. The colors are bland (black would be nice) and the gun takes up way too much space on screen. This is...
Of course they're improving it. I'm just saying, with some extra revenue, I feel they would feel more obligated to improve the service at a faster pace, knowing that they're getting some revenue from their users.
I get it, you're being sarcastic. Anyways, it's just an opinion. You can just come out and say your point rather than expressing sarcasm in every one of your statements. It gets redundant. :/
Honestly, this service is an absolute pain to deal with. At least if they charged for it, they could use that money toward making PSN a priority and bettering the service.
I think he or she is talking about commercial success. And the poor sales of Sorcery will probably just turn Sony off from making more Move games for the future.
This game looks decent enough to buy. I just wish the Vita had a true killer app by now...
Sad to see this game in development hell...
Heck, it'll probably release right at the end of this console's generation.
How is The Last of Us an evolution? As far as I can tell, it's looking to be a super excellent title for a game of its genre.
You know, if sony were to compile a similar list, I think you'd find a Call of Duty title on top as well.
Focus on the content, will you? Bashing websites is just an excuse to ignore what's happening...
Actually, no it isn't. The game had such promise when they first showed it off, I'm just disappointed. But I wish they would make more games that are exclusively developed for the move.
MS have already admitted, since the case started, that their Xbox 360 console violated the patents. The only thing MS are disputing is the ridiculous price Motorola are asking for a FRAND patent - an annual payout of $4 billion. That's a little too much, in my opinion. I mean, why does Motorola want to charge MS such a high amount when it charges other companies who use the tech only a few cents per unit sold?
ITC will probably not ban the XBox 360, but will force Motorola to license the tech to MS at a reasonable price (I mean, asking an annual $4 billion is way too much for any company to handle). It is a FRAND patent, after all. I mean, why discriminate one company by charging them such a ludicrous amount while charging others just a few cents per unit?
Well, considering SmartGlass is free with anyone who has just about any smartphone or tablet, I'd say they have a pretty good shot with the current Xbox userbase.