Well i am more concerned with why they are waiting till the day before to lift the embargo. Not only does that not make sense, it's kind of alarming.
Lol, Fortnite didn't rip off pubg. First off PubG didn't start the battle royal. Secondly, Fortnite took what was good of royal and made it their own from it's own gameplay stand point. Such as building, gliding, soon to be jetpacks etc.
@81BX
And the data don't lie either about the campaign getting worse and worse. Hence the lack of people playing the campaign. After World at War it just seems they quit focusing on the Single player portion. Which was very popular before that. And single player has made COD what it is today. The first 3 games was single player only and was pretty popular. Cod 3 sold about 6.5 mill in 2006, which was extremely good back then for a single player only game.
@TheUndertaker85
Is that the same "GOODWILL" MS used last gen to push out a faulty product on consumers to lose more?
Of course it's gamingbolt. Blocked that site ages ago.
@Septic
So when i developer does it, they should get the 3rd degree and should be skeptical. But when a certain console maker does it, support them day one. Very interesting.
@AZRoboto
Cause single player allows the devs to express a narrative to the gamer that is not available in multiplayer. And btw, i played World at War single player 3 to 4 different times and MW2 couple of times and the the single player only game of COD when there was no multiple player several times.
So were going to give you the exact same engine, same assets, same overpriced DLC, and exactly the same thing as before. But we're going to take half ...
Exactly. Just makes them lazy and cash in on the easy way of doing things. Next as someone stated above it will be COD warfare map editor. You pay 60 bucks and make your own maps and play them online.
Exactly what you said. You summed it up right. The campaigns have not been very good so people have not been playing them. If they put as much effort into the single player part as they do the multiplayer. Then maybe people would spend more time playing and finishing the single player. World at war i played through like 3 or 4 different times, cause i enjoyed it so much.
@Septic
So just cause someone likes single player campaigns, makes them a snob? Ohhh the irony in this statement.
@Septic
It's just to the point people are done with MS and how the treat consumers. Between RROD, giving up on 360 the last 3 years in terms of game, then to the debacle launch of Xbox1 with the whole 24 drm and constantly connected and etc. To now not giving people games just as the did with the end of life with the 360.
And to this comment "knocking the gargantuan that was Sony off its pedestal last gen".
MS didn't knock crap...
@mandingo
Please re read what you just typed. And let that sink in for a minute.
I'm with you....Give me punchout.
Well if you did. Then hopefully you capitalized each letter of a new sentence. =P
Like how they count multiple accounts to push their numbers.
@Neonridr
What does having some unoptimized issues have to do with anything? And honestly my computer was and is good enough to run Ark full tilt with no issues. Survival of the Fittest for Ark came out in july of 2015 and was the first game and not mod to introduce a full blown BR.
Actually Ark was very popular on PC. And it did BR style all the while taming dinos and such and collecting resources as the map shrunk in. For a big dino battle at the end. And that was long way before PUBG. So no pubg did not start or even a fad.
Don't forget Ark.
@alb1899
Well considering PUBG was not the first BR survival game. Ark was the one that actually started that.
@Snakeeater25
So you would rather them push it out the door unpolished then wait to release it polished? And btw, it will not be a PS5 game.