Digital Foundry and Anandtech has verified that PS4 is significantly more powerful.
Xbox fans only argues scientific facts.
And if specs didnt matter, they should have stuck with 360.
i mean he uses words like "cock sucker" "bullshit" "circle jerk"
on those who criticize Xbox One.
Butt hurt much?
for 15 games in 12 months?
Never heard that from MS.
Most games were CGI and was not closed to being finished.
EPIC is a second party studio.
Respawn exclusive is third party and like 99 percent third party exclusives, it ports.
PS4 sales are divided into Number 2,4,5,7,8 bundles.
While Xbox One is consolidated into single listing. I love how you just did a victory lab there dear "MS sheep"
I wouldnt say "flop" but pre orders after E3 announcment Sony is out selling it.
http://www.amazon.com/best-...
Number 1 and 3 are PS4.
Number 2 and 9 are Xbox 1.
Number 9 is pretty weak. Even PS4 controller is selling better....
comes to PS3. I dont see why not for PS4.
Apparently it is opposite "early dev"
which tells me MS dont have to much to show and have to pull games that are still far from being finished.
If they had so plenty of hardcore games to show, why show a one that is very early on development cycle?
Sony showed games that are plenty well developed. Enough to show gameplays which tells me they have plenty to show.
That PS3 was the reason what caused Sony to lose near 100 billions?
LOL. are you out of your mind? PS3 loss was tiny fraction in that 100 billion
Rule of thumb for any closed system is that you get double the performance.
As Carmack said himself, you typically double performance.
Plus you add all the other chips PS4 has to off load work what PC normally have to deal with...
one important comment
"Sony gave the PS4 50% more raw shader performance, plain and simple (768 SPs @ 800MHz vs. 1152 SPs & 800MHz). Unlike last generation, you don't need to be some sort of Jedi to extract the PS4's potential here. "
Yes they are same CPU, GPU.
But PS4 has better version and more of it.
Like GPU side. Same gpu, but 6 more cores resulting in 50 percent more power.
And faster clockrate and 2 more usable core on CPU with companion chip.
Again, More and better version of same GPU/CPU
Its same CPU, but faster clock rate.
Its same GPU, but more cores which result in 50 percent more power.
and there is ram.
Its just that PS4 has same stuff, but more or better version.
not hardware components.
Basically a one of the most trust worthy gaming journalism calls MS a BSer in very polite long article.
first each data centers are not each server. LOL thats delusional.
Each data center each hold thousands if not hundred thousand. it all varies per location. and MS is building 300k.doesnt have it currently
and you cant run graphics rendering on server. Thats not what MS wants to do. they want to "compute non latency sensitive"
not graphics dear fanboys. meaning graphics gonna the same. Unless u want to do graphics rendering on ser...
Even Eurogamers just called this cloud thing "wishful thinking"
now its 3 times?
This isnt confirmed?
Digital Foundry and Anandtech has verified that PS4 is significantly more powerful.
Xbox fans only argues scientific facts.
And if specs didnt matter, they should have stuck with 360.
Seems like xbox fanboys are desperately trying to push this through.