my girlfriend says the 360 is not as sexy as the PS 3
case closed.
and then they seem to forget that
$50 XBL
$99 wireless
$150 120GB HDD
oh well, a price drop wouldn't hurt. but as far as i'm concern, you even get an extra Blu-ray drive, which a 360 will never have. either way, price drop or not, PS 3 is still a pretty good deal.
i mean Kojima did throw in a DVD disc swap joke in MGS 4 right? so what would make him go back to DVD now?
360 in actuality means it goes out from the factory, gets to your hand, RROD, then goes back to the factory again. just like life, it's a cycle.
and lets hope the PS 3 version won't be dragged down because of the inferior 360 hardware ......... i'm already upset that GTA 4 and RE 5 were both downgraded for the same reason. (look at the lenght of RE 5 single player for proof, it's essentially no different than RE 4, way to go damnit)
to: Aarogance Greenterd
wow, prett good deal then. even cheaper than the DS3 itself. i might buy one later.
Game13 out.
he is just referring to the Xbot's logic (or lack thereof). and also, Halo 3 is not as unbeatable as you Xbots might have thought. If Wii Fit can manage to outsell it, just keep your eyes on Killzone 2. V_~
Sony doesn't need to buy exclusive deals with dev. sooner or later, the devs will start to have problems fitting all those data on DVD 9, then MS will start to have a real problem. even with the money they paid them, devs might still want to develop games for PS 3 since it is just the natural way to go.
Why playing with your fingers is better than PS 3.
/sarcasm
but Uncharted is a new franchise, of course it won't be as big as a system seller than RE 5. and i still think RE 5 is a better game than Uncharted nonetheless.
i thought they use their own technology on the 360 HDD thats why they charge so much because they make their own. if all those extra money only goes to the casing, then whoever buying it is getting their ass majorly ripped off by Microsoft.
it costs you 50G a year. but in reality it's only slightly better (if not neck-in-neck) with PSN. and now with the limitations bullcrap MS is imposing, well, ding ding ding, we have a winner, PSN winS! KO!
huh.... do you know how to read? Sony did it because they wanted to protect their music licenses but unfortunately it could be utilized by hackers to steal your info. whereas MS knowingly using your credit card info to charge your bill without your authorization.
huh... i guess you probably couldn't understand my comment anyway.
smiling and saying "give me some more" while MicroSh!t is sticking it up on their back sides. i guess they've got used to it already.
ok, Microsh!t might have acheieved their goal of prevent PS 3 install base grew, but at what cost?
do you know that Killzone 2 development cost is well within $50 million? so instead of investing that money to invent something new, Microsh!t just decided to use that money for something that is not so effective.
look at games like Killzone 2, i'm sure it will move alot more console sales than those DLC packs. so instead of getting games like Killzone 2, you xbots are treated with...
a big success? definitely not
a failure? probably ....
they could have given me that cool $50 mil and i would have done something more useful with it, like buying bread for every 3rd world kid.
Halo 3, meh.
i've always wondered what would the bots say if Killzone 2 is an 360 exclusive.
XBL = $50/yr
PSN = free
so i wouldn't call it a strong point for the 360, they just gotta be better than PSN since you are paying for it.