Yeah everything else is pretty nice but the foliage looks like PS2 era quality..kind of a dealbreaker
Randy Pitchfork
Well the PC has all the same games as what the Scorpio will have to offer and then some so if you don't like what PC has to offer then you REALLY won't like what Scorpio will be offering.
"without the hassle of PC".....
it's sad how many people miss out on PC gaming because people like this author try making it look like it takes a rocket scientist to be a PC gamer.
1,000,000 reasons why
Wow..you went full nerd
By the way just cuz they put Forza at PC Ultra graphics with 88% overhead doesn't equate to Scorpio doing the same in something like GTA V or Battlefield 1.You will really be let down if you expect that.More realistically you'll get mostly high settings,Ultra textures with that 8 gb memory,l and a little medium mixed in.Definitely still going to be gorgeous.l nonetheless.
I didn't know Ellie had so many freckles.I guess you learn something new everyday.
Freckles
Well you're definitely not getting 4k/60 fps with a Playstation 4 PRO.
My question is where do they make the cutoff line for choosing what platforms they develop games for?When the PS5 comes out are they going to stop supporting PS4 but WILL keep developing for PS4 PRO?..When the xbox after scorpio comes out in a few years will they cut off original xbox one and the S but keep developing for scorpio?
"beast of a console".....based of what performance benchmarks exactly?..Forza, a race sim that runs at 1080p 60 fps even on the joke of a Xbox One?...That's not an impressive benchmark.If you got these results on something like Witcher 3 or GTA V AND high settings then you have bragging rights.
Most of the stuff they tune down you DO visually see.When I play BF1 on my PC at ultra i can see better vegetation textures,cleaner image quality for objects in the distance and realistic shadows.When i boot up the PRO version of BF1 it looks great but the overall image quality looks a little blurrier after playing at ultra for so long.
I hope it does but if a GTX 1080 paired with a 6700k CPU can't do 4k without compromises then why the hell would a console with a GPU being compared to a 3 year old PC GPU be able to magically pull it off with a low end 2.7 ghz processor???
It's like consoles are becoming PCs with upgrades only their always 3 years behind PC specs.I mean 2.7ghz CPU? wtf is that?
Can't wait to see what Sucker Punch has in store at E3.
I agree it has to be open world in order to compare.Linear games just don't have as much to account for
I'm sure it will be incredible but they are building for a linear game unlike Horizin Zero Dawn's vast open world.There's just so much more that Guerilla Games had to account for than Last of Us 2.Of course Naughty Dog could surprise us and make Last of Us 2 open world.
Naughty Dog is arguably the most honest game development team out there so I certainly trust them but unless Last of Us 2 runs higher than the 1440p we saw in Uncharted 4 AND is open world then they won't top Horizon Zero Dawn.
If you read the article you would see the writer mentioned how most gamers play third party games like COD,Battlefield,Destiny etc so they ARE getting games...better looking ones in fact
My 1080 has GDDR5X