All Channels
Popular
CRank: 5Score: 3480

HERES WHAT I THINK:

Cockpit views: Forza looks better
Everything else graphics wise: GT5 but Forza has better Damaging
Weather effects: GT5 because Forza has none
Car sounds: Forza
Physics: Forza
Handling: Forza
Tuning: Forza
AI: Forza
Selection of cars: GT5
Customization: Forza
Game modes: Forza
Online: Forza

GT5 may seem more realistic in the graphics dep...

5324d ago 10 agree38 disagreeView comment

I jizzed all over my computer screen looking at this video!!!

5331d ago 6 agree4 disagreeView comment

Maybe better than a medium-low settings on the PC...but thats it...no higher!!! LOL

5338d ago 5 agree3 disagreeView comment

Meh!!! Not because the game sux...by no means does it suck...its a fricken classic!!! Its just that I have it for the gamecube, wii, and PC...i dont need another copy LOL

5338d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Now thats REAL!!! Why can't the multiplayer beta look as good as this??? This looks REALISTIC!!! Love it!!!

5338d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

From what I see is that the PS3 has sharper images and better textures but the downfall is that it doesn't look as natural and has alot of jaggies. The 360 may not have better textures but it looks more natural because it isnt too sharp. So they both have ups and downs to each

5339d ago 4 agree10 disagreeView comment

From what I see...the 360 has better day time scene with a brighter vivid unwashed look but in the tunnel scene...the ps3 is the better unwashed vivid one while the 360 looks washed out...I mean theres both upsides and downsides to each console. Either way, depending on your TV...you can slightly tweak it to your taste.

5340d ago 14 agree15 disagreeView comment

This should shut the PC Vs. Consoles argument for good!!!

This should be about consoles vs. consoles but for all you talking crap about PC...I hope this shuts your mouth for good. PC is miles and light years more advanced than consoles. And this is coming from a console fanboy. I have all consoles but it would be just ignorant and naive to pretend that consoles have better graphics than PC's. I wish I had an uber powerful PC, but its too damn expensive...LOL!!!

5579d ago 5 agree1 disagreeView comment

A. There is not enough space on dvd-9 to make a free roaming sandbox game thats so graphic intensive, there not enough space to put all those textures....with bluray, theres alot of space to put textures, epecially uncompressed.

or

B. The 360 hardware has been pushed to its limits and the processor cant handle it since it only 3 core and not quad.

But eitherway....the graphics are smoking hot and im gonna get this game....i think it looks even bett...

6151d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

You can always mod the A.I. like the super hard A.I. mod for crysis ...you can virtually mod everything in crysis with a bit of a little know how. Theres even a mod to put the Portal gun in Crysis.

watch this:

http://gamextract.com/?p=24...

6329d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

You all obviously havent played crysis on dx10 3-way sli on ultra high settings with natural mod in it. Its so realistic you feel like youre actually in the jungle about to be attacked by koreans. Especially with the god rays...oh my god....its so amazing.

http://gamevideos.1up.com/v...

Reasons why crysis is better:

It keeps looking better with the more amount of hi end graphics cards yo...

6330d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

Maybe $10...then thats when ill buy it. 20 dollars aint worth extra 5 hours or less of gameplay.

6369d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Even tho im a gears of war fanboy I agree with jaimee fox in that halo saved the xbox...so totally true. Without Halo, there would be no pathway to 360 and no gears of war.

6369d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

The first halo was a craze and a phenomenon ...its what got most people into 1st person shooters.....its what made 1st person shooters fun. I remember playing with 16 of my friends on system link, its the best fun i can remember. BUT....after the second halo came out, so did alot of first peson shooters and 1st person shooter start getting repetative after a while and boring.

Then, gears of war came out.....it was what made 3rd person shooters famous but its was more known for its...

6369d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

I ordered the limited edition gears 2 from best buy that came with the special edition remote control centaur gears 2 tank.

People who are haters are just blind. Its a great game....dont be blind to fanboyism.

6369d ago 1 agree4 disagreeView comment

WHY??

Because:

1. FPS games are getting old and boring, once you played a fps, all of them pretty much is the same.

2. Marcus fenix is way more badass than Nathan hale

3. There are more variety of enemies in GOW2 than R2. MOst of all the enemies in R2 looks the same. Gow2 enemies may not be as big, but its more badass.

4. GOW 2 has more blood and guts which is way cooler plus cool melee attacks that you dont get in r2...

6422d ago 5 agree2 disagreeView comment

Liar...can you trust Finaland???

6423d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

I hope the graphics are on par with killzone 2 this time or at least on par or better than COD4, other wise....only fanboys will buy it. I wont even get this halo game this time if its the same old halo 3.

6423d ago 2 agree10 disagreeView comment

Who said i was comparing features?, Im comparing how enemies look(graphics/design of enemies) moron, read before you post. I have both 360 and ps3, there is no fanboyism in my post. Im just being real with the graphics/design of the enemies.

6425d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

gears 2 has way better looking enemies than R2:

Gears has:

1. More types of enemies

+ 6 different looking locust(horde)
+ Kryll
+ 2 types of wretches
+ drones
+ berserkers
+ brumaks
+ reavers
+ corpsers
+ seeders

etc......plus new enemies in gears 2

2. Better textures on the enemies. They actually look greasy and oily when their oily or roughy and scaly when the...

6426d ago 9 agree9 disagreeView comment