More sheep :(.
Fact 1) 360 > PS3 overall global sales.
Fact 2) MS is one of the most lucrative companies in the world backed up by financial assets you could not imagine. They are not desperate...that word is NOT in their vocabulary.
Fact 3) The PS3 is a champ? Don't base PS3's abysmal performance on that of PS2's success of yester-year.
Again...I have no problems w/ a PS3. Infact there is one in my household (I do not own it). I am ...
Sony is selling on par with the 360? It is getting owned 2-1 in America, behind in Europe (ableit slightly), and has it's only advantage in Japan.
As for me wanting $600 hardware for $400? Price has never been an issue to me personally...but Sony's charge between (80gb vs 40gb) 40gb of hard drive space and wifi connectability (which both can be integrated for less than $50) and charging at $200 premium is ridiculous. Infact Sony's original strategy wasn't to bump sales of it's...
It amazes me how most of you will dismiss facts as a whim to defend a company that doesn't give two sh*ts about you. I don't own any machines...I did at one point, but I don't anymore. I'm going to list some facts...and while it may seem like I am bashing Sony and Praising the 360...facts are facts.
Fact 1) No single game on the PS3 looks better or IS better than any game out on the 360 or Wii. There is a lack of triple A titles across the board.
Fact 2) Most ...
It baffles me how many of you just don't spend time digesting what is being said. The article refers to 'performance at the moment'. Performance usually refers to the fluidity of a game; frames per second. When performance is mentioned it usually has nothing to do w/ the graphics of the game. I'll give you an example. GTA IV performed better (better fps) on the 360, but at the end of the day alot of reviewers gave the slight visual nod to the PS3. It's too early in development to take the com...