1. ODST- may match graphically, but i would not count on it. Gameplay will be superior.
2. Alan wake- will definitely match and surpass killzone 2 graphically. Gameplay?
3. DOOM 4- WILL EAT KILLZONE 2 ALIVE! for all systems...
4. Perfect dark - I know people testing this game, and they said the light and shadow contrast on this game is unbelievable. IT WILL SURPASS KILLZONE 2 GRAPHICALLY AND WILL HAVE BETTER GAMEPLAY!
5. Peter Ja...
What is the source of your "fact"?
you know you have no true "fact"... Why repeat Sony Cult Member fan bait? If you are going to make that statement make sure you can back it up. Make sure you understand both systems, their graphix capabilities (Xenos vs. Rsx) and have developed a game for both to come up with your so called "factual" conclusion. Why repeat something that is not a "fact"? You are only embarrassing yourself... Repeating So...
1. ODST- may match graphically, but i would not count on it. Gameplay will be superior.
2. Alan wake- will definitely match and surpass killzone 2 graphically. Gameplay?
3. DOOM 4- WILL EAT KILLZONE 2 ALIVE! for all systems...
4. Perfect dark - I know people testing this game, and they said the light and shadow contrast on this game is unbelievable. IT WILL SURPASS KILLZONE 2 GRAPHICALLY AND WILL HAVE BETTER GAMEPLAY!
5. Peter Jackso...
@Darkseider
Either you are very arrogant, or the greatest programmer ever! The Reason why I say this is because you say devs are too lazy to learn Cell coding. However, coding for multithreading processors has yet to be mastered, let alone three dual threaded cores. Unless you have cracked the secretes of multi threading technology, why waste time, money, and possibly, quality, trying to figure out the CELL (especially when coding is becoming more efficient, and programmers ar...
Little ones, please listen to the devs!!!
The ps3 is not the superior console... in theory maybe, but in reality, not at all. Ps3 has the blu-ray (storage) advantage, and that's it! Potentially Devs maybe able to get more out of the PS3's processor alone, but the 360's setup is no slouch... what is meant is the combination of the 360's gpu and cpu is greater than the ps3's cpu, gpu combination. Also, the 360's has alot more total and accessible memory. (Listen to the devs!) Cult member...
which console is actually more powerful?
"I'm going to have to answer with an 'it depends,'" laughs Shippy, after a pause. "Again, they're completely different models. So in the PS3, you've got this Cell chip which has massive parallel processing power, the PowerPC core, multiple SPU cores… it's got a GPU that is, in the model here, processing more in the Cell chip and less in the GPU. So that's one processing paradigm -- a heterogeneous paradigm."
...
YOU HAVE TO DO BETTER THAN GETTING QUOTES FROM A DEV OWNED BY SONY (WHO DIDN'T HAVE 5 YEARS TO GET TO KNOW 360's HARDWARE)!!! YOU CRACK ME UP! PLEASE DO NOT BE ANOTHER IGNORANT SONY CULT MEMBER! LET US NOT FORGET, BUNGIE SAID HALO 3 COULD ONLY BE DONE ON THE 360...
Not to trash your opinion, but you should do some more research on both systems. If you did, you will realize that the 360 GPU is capable of processing data and calculations BETTER THAN PS3's CELL. The 360's GPU is under estimated; when it is combined with the processing potential of the three multithreading cores, the 360 is capable of producing all of the things you have mentioned. The only problem is storage disk space...
If anyone believes that the xbox 360 is not capable producing graphics equivalent or even superior than that of Killzone 2, then you cult members are ignorant, and you will be in for a big surprise (perfect dark 3 guaranteed CG graphics and many more). For your own good, resist listening to ridiculous rants of a brainless sony cult member, who obviously has no clue on how neither system works and is capable of. He is no dev. he is just another SONY CULT MEMBER! Of course, if you take a develo...
PDZ was a litte cartoony, and a lot of fans from the original complained... Rare learned their lesson, and is returning to a more grittier game. What we should expect is great graphics and interesting gameplay; It will be on par with anything out including Halo 3, COD4 &5, Gears 2, and Killzone 2... Rare is capable of producing great graphics... even PDZ had good graphics; especially the reload animation, which is equal to Killzone 2's, better than Halo 3's and the COD series. If Rare was...
To Hercules:
Another ignorant pretender, learn how to read. My post states that the GPU of the 360 (NOT THE PROCESSOR) can out perform calculations of the CELL (the processor) of the PS3. Do you research before you reply, and stop pretending like you know what you are talking about. The systems are not equal, one system has an advantage over the other and vice versa.
ACTIVISON: CALL OF DUTY 4.... not decent but GREAT GAME
DUMB ASS!!!
Rekkapryde (I doubt you are a dev.)
You are an ignorant sony CULT MEMBER... Ignorant to the facts. Ignorant to the fact that sony gave Guerrilla millions of $$$ and over five years to develop Killzone 2. I guarantee, if you give devs that much money and time to develop the same game separately on the ps3 and 360.... the lighting and graphics will be superior on the 360. It is pure logic, science and facts... Ask any unbiased respected dev that understands the hardware of both...
Animation:
PS3 > Xbox360
Textures:
Xbox 360 > PS3
Lighting:
Xbox 360 > PS3
There is no way the PS3 is more capable in producing superior graphics than the Xbox 360.... NO WAY. If you Sony cult members believe this deceitful article, you are as ignorant as the author. Any dev, whether it be a programmer, or a artist, will tell you that the 360 is more capable in producing the superior graphics. I have talked to a friend...
?
From the developer’s perspective, they believe, like the majority, the Xbox 360 is more capable in terms of graphics. They are not the only ones to think this. Sony cult members want to say "what about Killzone", which is a legitimate argument... but what the cult members fail to realize is that it took Guerrilla five years and millions of dollars to squeeze out the power of the ps3. In terms of money and time, the xbox 360 is more capable of producing superior graphics than the PS3...
In terms of animation, Killzone 2 will become the bench mark in which future FPSs will model after. Killzone's animation is flawless, and quite remarkable.... too bad the textures don't match it!!!!! ANIMATION IS ABOVE ALL, but GRAPHICALLY (TEXTURES) this game is way overhyped by sony cult members....
PC games will be light years away from anything the PS3 or 360 can do if they decide to prolong this generation. Big mistake... But they can do as they wish, they have us in their pockets and whatever they decide to do, we have to accept it. The love of money will destroy the gaming industry and will hamper technological advancements in performance and graphics. DAMN THE WII and CASUAL GAMERS, DAMN THEM ALL TO HELL!!!!
First off I own a ps3, but I am not blind, nor bias, nor a cult member like the rest of you. Like I have said in my previous comments, i see the weaknesses in both systems; When I look at Killzone 2 in motion, there is no game out there that can touch it in terms of animation. But since you have a untrained eye, you are unfortunately blind to Killzone's lack of textures... I ask you to take some 3d character modeling, texturing and rendering classes, so your eyes will be opened... If there is...
The PS3 does not have more capable RAM than the 360, absolutely no way. The PS3 has 256mb of main memory period. The 256mb video RAM is not shared, so that leaves only 256 for the CELL to work with. On the other hand the 360 has 512mb shared memory. at any given point the memory for the Xenos can exceed the RSX. This shared memory makes the 360 a more capable machine... Oh yeah, this is my first account with N4G...
SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME WHY KILLZONE LACKS TEXTURE!!!!!
Why are Sony Cult Members sooooo dumb and blind?