Why should BF3's fate depend on a random XBLA game? I don't get that, it's a guaranteed hit unless Lucasarts clearly does something wrong,
And making a BF game shouldn't be that complicated. You copy and paste an iconic SW location, add a few flags and vehicles to the environment, then, well, nothing else!
I disliked them after about two missions. I don't get the praise for it.
I remember Brotherhood's excellent MP, if only the same could be said about III's.
The first one was flawed in some cases but full of potential. If they can improve upon the original's concepts, I think we can expect a great co-op game.
Look at all of the PlayStation and Nintendo fanboys going to town with the dislike option! For all of you PlayStation loyalists; the game's coming to your system too, so why hate?
Can't stand MS when they pull off stupid shit like timed exclusivity.
I guarantee we're getting a Bungie ViDoc on Sunday.
The graphics are 2007 quality.
I regret pre-ordering on Steam now... This is disappointing
Complain all you want, but DICE knows how to make DLC that's worth the price. 20+ New maps, weapons, modes, privilidges for $50. It's like a whole new game.
All I read was “wow, that would be a kick-ass video game to completely waste"
I love Halo. But Halo 4's multiplayer went too far for me. Everything is too random now.
Cross out Call of Duty, it's way too soon to reveal new one
"That will make it more powerful than a top-end PC"
Lol no
What a terrible article...
Releases the day of GTA 5. I guess i'm spending $100+ that day.
I loved Guerilla, amazing open world. Haven't played the originals though. However, I have played Armageddon, and what a letdown!
Seriously? The PS Vita is powerful, but Crysis? Don't exaggerate
Good game? Yes. Good Halo game? No.
Sorry, but they exterminated Halo multiplayer with this game.
Actually, this map pack works well on consoles considering their generally smaller scale and more streamlined gameplay.