Rating games on a numerical scale says very little unless it is very clear what the criteria are for giving certain points and decimals. On top of that it is absolutely nonsense to, for example, compare a 9.2 for Batman to a 9.1 for Bloodborne, both are completely different games and should only be compared to games that are alike or the same, only then is a numerical comparison logical.
Rating games with a scale is always going to give problems, a 9 for a game that I don't like feels like an idiotic score, a 7 for a game I adore feels too low. Why don't we all agree to ditch the numbers and write reviews with a summary at the end with only the pro's and con's, much easier and less frustrating. Only downside is that people have to read the review.
Since when did game journalism become a synonym for half ass predictions based on a half ass experience, smh :/
This weather update is beautiful, it really adds to the experience of the game. One of the best racing games I have played for a long time on PS or on any other console.
Seems like a pretty fair score, I like my PS4 but it can improve in some areas.
Articles like this really are getting old.
Well.... my Vita just became much more relevant.
The only weird thing I see is the fact that a next gen game can't keep a stable 30fps on either next gen console.
I got that too, simply going to 3d person view and back fixed it for me though.