Good then that makes your last comment rather childish and pointless. Looks like you just needed to let off some steam you nerd.
If you aren't the idiot that made the justification about paying an extra 10 dollars, then why are you the new idiot responding for him as if you have a point?
Disagree all you want to my posts. I'm not here to win popularity. Furthermore, it only stengthens the proof on which gamers, as a whole, are mostly sheep that will but into any corporate agenda.
^That's your retort? Please tell me you're joking.
@re2apocalypse
First off, no one says tool anymore unless you came here in a time machine from 2008 or you live in some culturally delayed shit hole like pakistan. Second,the level of hostility showing through you just because the other guy has a point shows me you're the epitome of what makes a fanboy, even though I detest such usually meaningless names. And third, go pay your extra 10 dollars on top of 20. No one here gives a shit. While your at it, why not pay 40; It&#...
they should change the name of this site from N4G to "Safe Haven for Nerds to Write Redunantly long paragraphs". Ever post is a long ass novel. No one gives a shit about any one of ur boring ass speculations based off no credentails. Better wrap this up before mine forms a paragraph too.
I give this review a 1/5 for being 2 weeks late to the party. While rock star has made over a billion dollars from hard work, dedication, and listening to the gamer feedback to make one of the greatest games of all time, we get some unknown douche self proclaimed "reviewer" who uses the "perspective" card to justify his moronic rant.
oh whats wrong pussy. cant take some raw heated emotion toward an issue? btw really substantial reply u made there.
no,...you just fail at understanding what i said. iif you would have read my comment as to why the right analog is better in its normal position then you would understand. the right analog should be in its convnetional position because left and right turning are the primary uses for it, with looking up and down being secondary. Therefore, if you moved the right as the same position as the left, you would be making looking up and down the thumb extnesion movement when you want it to be looking...
Here's the problem with symmetrical dual sticks: they are not ergonomically friendly. I hate the xbox one with a passion but will admit a lot of research has gone into making both the 360/one controllers and the reason for a raised left analog is because in FPS games(etc) most of ur movements are ups and downs (walking forward and backing up, while strafing is secondary. The higher placement of the left stick allows for those primary movements much more comfortable because it is a natura...
Ok, first and foremost , this is my first post on n4g and decided it to be so after seeing so many unbelievable xbox one fanboys on here ranting about how the gamer community has destroyed the potential of xbox one. Let me start of by kindly stating the obvious-YOU ARE A MORON!
Now…let me explain why. You seem to have this fetish with “always online”, “digital game sharing”, and “cloud gaming”. Ok, that is fine. But what isn’t fine is doing so by compromising consumer rights. There is...
if hitler offered you a bag of diamonds to hand over the whearabouts of some jews in hiding, the pros would outweigh the cons for you i bet
They could of still used the 10 share feature by making you sign into live, and freeze playing ability on ur current system while you allow for it to be shared to someone else. Dont think for a sec that the change in policy had anything to do with it.
Ok, first and foremost , this is my first post on n4g and decided it to be so after seeing so many unbelievable xbox one fanboys on here ranting about how the gamer community has destroyed the potential of xbox one. Let me start of by kindly stating the obvious-YOU ARE A MORON!
Now…let me explain why. You seem to have this fetish with “always online”, “digital game sharing”, and “cloud gaming”. Ok, that is fine. But what isn’t fine is doing so by compromising consumer rights. There is...
Ok, first and foremost , this is my first post on n4g and decided it to be so after seeing so many unbelievable xbox one fanboys on here ranting about how the gamer community has destroyed the potential of xbox one. Let me start of by kindly stating the obvious-YOU ARE A MORON!
Now…let me explain why. You seem to have this fetish with “always online”, “digital game sharing”, and “cloud gaming”. Ok, that is fine. But what isn’t fine is doing so by compromising consumer rights. There is...
Ok, first and foremost , this is my first post on n4g and decided it to be so after seeing so many unbelievable xbox one fanboys on here ranting about how the gamer community has destroyed the potential of xbox one. Let me start of by kindly stating the obvious-YOU ARE A MORON!
Now…let me explain why. You seem to have this fetish with “always online”, “digital game sharing”, and “cloud gaming”. Ok, that is fine. But what isn’t fine is doing so by compromising consumer rights. There is...
Ok, first and foremost , this is my first post on n4g and decided it to be so after seeing so many unbelievable xbox one fanboys on here ranting about how the gamer community has destroyed the potential of xbox one. Let me start of by kindly stating the obvious-YOU ARE A MORON!
Now…let me explain why. You seem to have this fetish with “always online”, “digital game sharing”, and “cloud gaming”. Ok, that is fine. But what isn’t fine is doing so by compromising consumer rights. There is...
Hi Can someone help me understand this. I thought the human brain could only take in close to 60-70 fps visually. I thought I remember reading that somewhere. Also wouldn't the higher 240 fps actually make things appear slow. I thought thats how people capture things like bullets in slow motion etc, thru higher frames. I always thought 30 fps was ok but the once u got to 60 fps, that was as smooth as it gets, but after 60 fps, it start to be too much and creates the slow effect.
Can someone help me understand this. I thought the human brain could only take in close to 60-70 fps visually. I thought I remember reading that somewhere. Also wouldn't the higher 240 fps actually make things appear slow. I thought thats how people capture things like bullets in slow motion etc, thru higher frames. I always thought 30 fps was ok but the once u got to 60 fps, that was as smooth as it gets, but after 60 fps, it start to be too much and creates the slow effect.
This message is a general statement, unapplicable to any one comment. Stop trying to digress the point being made about the joke of a community that is N4G
...