BO2 was really good as far as multiplayer..its the one i played the most... ive played since MW1 .. ghost was alright...but not good.. AW never felt like a COD game to me.. i couldnt get into it at all.. when i tried the beta for BO3 i was excited because it felt like a COD game again.. with alittle bit of the jet pack.. but not too much
this was 3 years ago
99gamers.com is where its at
they always say.. 'you wont be able to quick scope blah blah blah.. new fish dynamics.. new engine .. blah blah blah' then when we play it its the same damn game... and im a COD fan lmao.. i just wish they stop lying
isnt it the same on ghosts and AW?
looks crispier .. from ps3 to ps4 its huge.. but from ps4 to pc its like ehhh im alright but still nicer.. easier on the eye especially far away
all i wanna say is.. WOOOOOW.. we came a long way.. it might not be the best crispiest ... but for how huge the game is... compared to gta 3 wow.. sometimes you have to stop and just take a deep breath .. enjoy the scenery
God of War 4 thats what it made me thing about idk why .. i know its different engines
i was under the impression since the first trailer.. that this was 'next gen' only and pc.. i never saw anything about ps3 and 360.
this article can be used vice versa why call of duty people like it better than BF .. it all depends on preference .. one is more realistic but some people dont like that.. boohoo .. some like small maps.. and quick battles.. some like huge maps... its all opinion .. i can play both. im alright with both.. BF to me runs stiff and alittle more boring if im looking more of a arcade style quick game.. and if i want to get all strategic then ill play BF
i was thinking like last gen graphics with current gen lighting .. it helps it look better.. not bad for a one man job.. i wouldnt be able to do this.. i would probably make something like E.T. on atari lmao
graphics is one thing.. resolution is another.. they can make a game look cartoony.. but thats the style so graphics dont really matter.. but if the game is cartoony and it looks sharp.. that does make a difference .. its aesthetics .. yea the gameplay is what makes a game good.. but sometimes its matter of opinion .. theres games i hated and the majority of people love.. and games that i loved..and alot of people though otherwise ..
all this looks like killzone had sex with destiny
the arm and the sleeve of the shirt.. remind of me ps3 like.. ok graphics with good make up on .. the rest looks really great
all the good games i remember were on the list.. i didnt really play alot of n64 .. other than.. mario 64 i still play that like once a year.. from beginning to end
holy hell.. im sure we got the same package.. but on my good days i only get close to 55-57 mb/s like 11.5 up
you'll be surprised how slow the internet is here in the U.S. compared to some other well developed countries... U.S is like dial up compared to them..
so this is pretty much a video we've seen before.. but with like 2 little added parts to it.. smh
agree.. its like bad graphics with good make up on... by that i mean the levels have low polygon count.. but they just throw in an HD texture and call it a day... dont get me wrong.. ima COD fan.. i dont care what people say.. those battlefield people.. most of them switched.. cause they heard somebody that knows somebody that knows somebody.. and they think that person is cool and makes awesome decisions so they want to be like them.. battlefield to me is like a really pretty girl that ever...
my fat 60gb still works like it did since day one.. my buddy had the 40gb that came out later..and his took a shit in like a year..