Ancient Gamer

Drithe

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 68720

Christian Bale would make a hell of a Snake.

4955d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

I enjoyed BF bc2 way more than BF3. I mean BF 3 had more open and larger fields which sucked imo, considering you could only play 12 on 12. Bring on BF BC3! To be honest, I just did not like BF 3 all that much.

4959d ago 5 agree3 disagreeView comment

IMO buy a ps3. I mean, sometimes you want to play that awesome rpg on a big screen instead of a bitty screen anyways. And why the hell would you not have a ps3 and only a Vita anyways? lol.

4959d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Game is looking better and better. The more the merrier. Great job on Nariko.

4959d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Ever since he took over Square had gone down hill.

Imagine you are playing the final boss, or any exciting part of the game where the adrenaline is rushing and you are on the edge of your seat playing .... then an add for male diapers comes on .... ARE YOU FREAKING KIDDING ME!

Ads will take away from the gaming experience imo, unless you get to play them for free. But even then will they time these adds just right or throw them in after so many minutes.

4961d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

When Kojima speaks ... the world listens!

4965d ago 5 agree4 disagreeView comment

Hey. I just like going in and blowing crap up. BF Bad Company filled that void. But BF 3 does not. I hate playing on player owned servers. I played on a couple that has the best fps players I ever seen. All they did was snipe people from 2 miles away. They were that good. I want to play with people that are NOOBS LIKE ME!

Also, the fields are just too damn big for only 24 players/ 12 on 12. IT does get boring fast.

I appreciate BF 3 for what it does. The best team...

4965d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

die elf boy!

4968d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

win

4968d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

ownage

4968d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

the technology is OLD for the PS3. But this is a brilliant idea. If you could keep it down to 300 dollars, and it would be possible to do so, Sony would destroy all for the next 2 years.

But it is about time for a new system though. I mean one where I can play against 100 people online at one time in a fps. Or maybe even 500 in a mmorpg or something.

4970d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Wooooooooo!

4971d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Me too!

4974d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

4 vs 4 mp. No thanks.

4974d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

They should let someone who likes these type of games review them, then someone who doesnt. That way we can get a view from both.

This review was from a little girl who obviously hates these type of agressive evil games and likes hello kitty and zelda better. She should have never been allowed to review this game.

End of Line.

4976d ago 3 agree6 disagreeView comment

The problem with games like MAG is that it has to constantly have tons of player to play. Eventually, a game gets old and some people want to move on. It hurts the rest that want to still play.

End of Line.

4987d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Guild Wars 2 baby. Buy it at full price and play for free forever!!!

15 bucks a month, after 40 bucks for initial pay is pathetic. THEY SHOULD LET YOU DOWNLOAD THE GAME FOR FREE if they are going to charge you 15 bucks a month!!

End of Line.

4987d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

WHY CANT I PLAY CRASH BANDICOOT ON MY VITA!!! ARRRGGHH!!

End of Line.

4991d ago 6 agree0 disagreeView comment

Not homophobic. Just anti-gay. You sound like you are christianphobic or morally disgusting.

5006d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment
5006d ago Show