that gives me another reason not to buy natal because I certainly don't wanna use it when Im playing Gears.
And apparently,this game isn't getting any first-party support from Sony.Guess even Sony knows Tecmo can't come up with anything ground-breaking or outstanding,especially for shooters.And your right.How can a game be only 50% finished when it has only half a year before its release date.I suspect that we are looking at a major flop here.
I thought Epic has already given up fixing GoW2.After all these title updates,I have simply come to the conclusion that this game is broken in its nature and no patch can save it.Epic may as well make a new gears to make up for its mistake on GoW2,but I doubt people will trust them anymore after how messed up GoW2 multiplayer was at launch.
I really want to give this game a chance,but from the tone of the developer when he was talking about multiplayer,it seems like he doesn't even plan to focus on multiplayer or make it as great as the singleplayer.To me,if this game doesn't have a decent multiplayer,I may rent it or simply just pass it.
What's wrong?I am just being honest.Do you seriously think the graphics look realistic and awesome???especially in the coockpit view,it looks really awful.
Videogamer.com is a MS slave site.I don't think anyone should trust their reviews.
Gamereactor is doing it again.Look at what it did to U2.Good Luck,FM3,and prepare for two or three more reviews like this from gamereactor.
The multiplayer part of it sounds really lame.But after all,its tecmo thats developping the game,so I really don't expect much from this game from day one.I really wish they just copied GoW2 rather than made their own stuff.The majority of Japanese PS3 owners don't like shooters,while this game won't succeed in other regions either unless it got a decent multiplayer.
You know what makes a person a true fanboy?Look at those idiots who send reviewers hatemails,each of which contains nothing but "your a fanboy." A recent example will be the U2 review by G4TV.I bet Adam had tons of fun just reading those hatemails sent by xbox fanboys.
a game which uses a primitive engine,has a 4-hour-only campaign and an old multiplayer and is overpriced?No,I don't want it.
This is a great article.Its true that when PS3 owners claim some websites are biased,everybody just thinks they are fanboys despite their reasons and reasonable arguments.For example,after gametrailer pulled out their review for U2,some people questioned why they kept saying U2 had nothing of its own despite the fact that they totally ignored the lack of orginality in some games,such as Halo:ODST and Gears 2.As a result,these threads in the gametrailer forum were deleted one by one by mods wh...
9.5 is a great score,but complaints about the controls in U2 is a rare case.Even in the video review,the guy showed some gameplay in attempt to prove the flaws of the controls,but all I can see is that this guy sucked at this game and there's absolutely nothing wrong with the controls.It seems like the reviewer just wants the game to auto-aim the enemies for him.The flaws of the platforming section are legit though.They are not flexible and feel automatic,as mentioned in many other U2 reviews...
He gave Halo:ODST a 5/5.That's one of the handful full scores Halo:ODST got in all its reviews.Hes just being honest about Uncharted 2.
I hope these skins will be available in multiplayer,too.
How desperate MS is towards the fall of sales of 360s these days.Maybe if they focus more on producing first-party and second-party games instead of playing these tricks,the consumers will have more incentive to buy 360s.
are you kidding me?It's like deciding whether you should get a full-HD TV or a plasma TV provided that they are the same price and same size.
Nobody hates Brutal Legend.Why would I hate it?Its just a mediocre game.If you want funny dialogue,why don't you just go watch a movie?Do you seriously buy a game because it has funny dialogue and good soundtrack?Your just gonna ignore the last gen graphics and boring gameplay??
Seriously,did you guys play the demo?Not only is Uncharted 2 one hundred times better than this piece of crap,this game isn't even worth renting.I didn't even bother to finish the demo because it was so dumb.First of all,the gameplay is boring,repetitive and unorginal.The combat is laggy,and the graphics are last gen.The worst thing is the voice acting isn't impressive as well.Uncharted 2 doesn't have hollyword voice acting and yet it is so much better.
that explains a lot about GT's trend of reviews.Anyway,I never expect every single reviewer to be honest or unbiased.The whole orginality thing the reviewer talks about when defending his U2 review is flawed,especially after he said "When we review games, we put an extremely high emphasis on originality." To be honest,I watched almost every single one of their reviews for 360 and PS3 games and the only times I heard them criticising a game's orginality are in KZ2 and U2's reviews.