No I'd expect xbox to deliver on the no chi and to show up playstation. Which they failed on both fronts. It was a mid show a better xbox show then there has been but a mid show none the less.
I'd give them both b-. Xbox hyped this up for what it was.
It was an okay show case. I'd give it a b - just like sonys showcase.
It was okay. And Starfield does not look good the motion but was bad.
Every game I've seen that doesn't have xbox studio with it is coming to ps5. I'm glad I kept my expectations low.
@Sonic1881
Yes I'm with you after playing nms and star citizen sf just looks bland to me.
A lot of third party stuff I figured xbox would be swinging hard with first party.
It's been okay so far.
I'm with you and the combat looked clunky. I enjoyed fable though.
I didn't like avowed at all. Idk what if was the combat seemed clunky like oblivion.
Avowed didn't look as good as I hoped it would.
If your list was populated with only exclusives I'd give it to you. Halo infinite was a let down though they did not deliver on that.
How many are you going to comment on? It's a Microsoft issue not just an Xbox issue.
A lot of regular gamers don't care one way or another. It's the hard-core fan basses on both sides that have blown this to something bigger. Me I don't care for the deal everyone at activision gets to ride off into the sunset and have no repercussions what so ever. Also consolidating the video game industry is bad.
I have remote play set up on my pc and my phone. I also have children and a wife who is in school. I will most likely buy one for the screen size.
They just aren't showing trailers 3 or 4 years out anymore. It's not that the aren't making new games you are only going to hear about then 1 or 2 years out.
Me for when my kids need to watch Mrs. Rachel for the thousandth time in a day.
600k sold direct from site is not good? I'm confused on your angle ElfHead. If you don't think 600k for a optional add on is good what is?
Fallout 3 was broken as well on launch.