@Dynasty2021:
I´ve played both of em & i dont know what youre talking about? Is your imagination playin tricks with your eyes?
Just take a look at the character models in skyrim, how they move etc - i doesnt hold a candle to SS. Sure the landscape looks good and the lightning is a ok - but truth is if we take a look on gfx only SS has way better gfx overall than skyrim. Even when modded.
Doesnt matter wich super PC you play skyrim on...
Youre most definitly wrong - I know I care.
Im still waiting for an official apology from the mess that MS tried to force upon us last year.
Until then (if id ever consider one) - xbox is a no go for me.
@CertifiedGamer:
You really dont have a clue do you? "since back in January"?
If you cant see all the problems this game has as of today i guess youre either spilling out shill talk, or you're blind?
So wich one is it?
Ah yeah, cant be blind since you can read & post in here.
You really dont need to lick it if you really dont want to. ;b
Its easily becoming one of the worst MP games ive ever played.
I still play it, i went premium at launch & i get in there with hopes of it getting better after each patch/expansion.
Its really tragic that Im still hanging on to this mess. Dont even try playing 64 players on the new "Naval Strike"-expansion.
Its becoming laughable how bad it is. - and there is no option to play conquest with 32 players? So the whole game mode conquest is pretty mu...
With a lot of unneccessary hassle yes.
Especially if you play with more than 2 ppl.
The so called "whining" is very justified in this case.
Im more interested in why you're getting so "frustrated" about TLOU getting many well deserved awards?
You said it yourself:
" It's a game with wonderful character interaction and characterization. Probably the best we've ever had."
*confused*
Awesome - communication is key!
;)
Brokenfield winning the award would have been disrespecting the very form of online multiplayer.
Its broken & unplayable.
I can't see the "logic" in that?
But yeah mp in GTAV really isnt that good either.
game is 900$ with high settings and at least 720$ on medium settings - well at least on PC.
both crappy deals imo
PC isn't even really that cool anymore, its been quite the bore since 2000 and Microsoft , Intel or ASUS cannot even manage to change that.
why would anyone refer to them as "a good investment"?
gonna rock this game in either 1440p or on the 1600p beauty, and eventually, replay it in 4k when those co...
I didnt know CBOAT did interviews? ;)
@kx11:
Glad you answered.
Ive played them both & while they both look good I cant agree that any of them holds the same graphical quality as TO's human "builds" - look at those faces for instance.
Since I havent seen much of the environment in TO I will hold my comparison til the final product arrives.
Crysis 3 & Assassins Creed 4 certainly holds their own merits in overall graphical design, but to say...
@kx11:
I play PC games. Exactly what title did you suggest is as good as this?
Just curious.
Well - i meant the first plan, or design choice of the xbox one.
The DRM, the 24 hour check, the used games policy etc?
Did they ever admit they were on the wrong track?
Did Microsoft ever admit their first plan was a bad idea?
:D
@star129:
Nope, they dont get dental care for free. There are exceptions were people who dont have any money can get it for free, but that gets cut from their paycheck later on.
If you have money - you'll pay it yourself.
There are other things that cost tax payers money wich can be upsetting for many ppl. But that is another discussion & that discussion doesnt belong here on N4G's newsfeed.
i did not forget.
i wont buy it until i know it works properly.