All Channels
Popular

darkrider

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 45250

Nope. They run away when they could. They didn't want to keep making the same game forever because Microsoft wanted

1607d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I hope you're wrong. That's the end of gaming. Microsoft got no vision on gaming, no ability to create new games, doesn't understand what gamers want...

1607d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

They still don't understand that. I never saw gamers so blind. They think Microsoft will keep the price of gp for ever and keep losing money... Then, without having any other choice they will pay whatever they want if you want to play...

1607d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Not really. Xbox is taking everything from everybody... Just imagined videogaming without Microsoft but with Sega... A company that was able to create games, new ip and innovation.

1607d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yes it's bad. Because halo 5 was number one... This one wasn't after 6 years without a halo game... Xbox gamers don't even buy games on Christmas... Scary stuff.

1607d ago 14 agree15 disagreeView comment

Not really. Activision made 2 billion with Cod where 60%+ sales on Sony machines... Cut that... Now multiply that for all the games not coming out. Now multiply the budget and marketing of all those games. Not really. But that's not what Microsoft is going now. They just want gamers to get gp at any cost.

1607d ago 3 agree4 disagreeView comment

Yes, Activision was in very bad place getting billions each year just with Cod and almost zero investment on a next Gen engine. Number one game sold in the market... Save by a publisher that doesn't have a single number one on any month in how many years? Anyone knows? The last time that Microsoft was able to have a game number one in the charts worldwide....

1607d ago 8 agree4 disagreeView comment

Don't you? they will compare the s version and the X version. Done. And they will copy paste the analysis. the s version is great for such cheap console and the X is setting standard against well noyhing else...

1607d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

The question isn't that, because there are more publishers. The question it's the strategy of Microsoft. One year two publishers. What will you say after EA, after take two. Because they won't stop here. Microsoft isn't using money from the gaming divisions to buy the publishers. Because never in their combined history they made 80 billions profit... It from a company with trillions.. This means they can spent 50 billion on EA, 100 on Rockstar. And it's nothing for Micros...

1608d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Not really, quite the opposite. Like Nintendo. No need of pc. Must make their games only on PS system, much less day one. That's only for Microsoft because their games sales are low. You don't need that when selling 16 millions, 12 millions, 10 millions...

1608d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

The quality of the game is amazing. Greta work from gg

1608d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

You want? Why do you want games to be only available on something that only a small amount of players are... Not even half of Microsoft gamers are after 5 years and you can get it for one buck...

1608d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Activision made billions with each Cod on Playstation, it is where there are more Cod players. But Microsoft will make it exclusive and lose billions each year. Battlefield will grow and take it place. As number one seller in the world.

1608d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

EA, take two, ubisoft, Nintendo, sony

1608d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Well. A success where? On pc the only place with numbers it avg 31k players in comparison the old destiny 2 got 58k... On consoles we don't know nothing. Just the fact that the game wasn't number one on the charts on December. I don't even know. If any halo wasn't number on the month it was launched.... But yeah it really made the diference...

1608d ago 6 agree19 disagreeView comment

Sony didn't buy two publisher. The biggest in Europe in one year. Damn some don't even understand what this means. Microsoft didn't buy a studio, but a publisher with tons of studios.

1608d ago 19 agree1 disagreeView comment

Aren't being bullied. Like bungie wasn't? Yeah. Like rare died and is doing gaas games... There isn't a single studio under Phil that was able to grow.

1608d ago 18 agree2 disagreeView comment

Best games another forza and another halo. Amazing... Dude, Phil Spencer wasn't able to create any new blockbuster game since is there... Zero. That's why he is buying them... Pay to win...

1608d ago 21 agree4 disagreeView comment

Well, df will soon be out of a job.... Nothing to compare that anyone cares...

1608d ago 4 agree16 disagreeView comment

No one with half a brain would say this is good for videogaming. Of course the blind followers will say it's good... But only those. Because Microsoft won't stop here and there are other big publishers cheaper then 70 billions. Again not talking about studio purchase, but publishers... Now Microsoft doesn't need to make new games it will just milk all the franchises they already have.

1608d ago 30 agree7 disagreeView comment