Yep having a lag free server with heaps of players is all good and well but if no one supports the game which I see happening with MAG (look at SOCOM Online and how well that did, especially when BC2 comes out in March and will do roughly the same gameplay only much more fun, less players but its a hell of a lot more fun to play). Multiplayer only, less than stellar graphics and game modes that aren't executed as well as Battlefield I see doing poor in the reviews (low 60s) combine this with ...
Lol MAG is easy anyways all you do is sit and camp. Ever heard of Aion or even Age of Conan? Yep MMO's do this on a much larger scale and with much better graphics. Sorry but for 256 players sure it looks ok far from bad but compared to something like Bad Company 2 which will probably be modded to have up to 128 players its pretty lame, decent for consoles though.
@Foliage I own a PC which floors even the PS3's best game uncharted 2 with great graphics and still large players wh...
If both games looked the same then this wouldnt have gone under the radar. Because it looks worse on PS3 all the droids just say its a crap game because the devs don't know how to develop equally across platforms.
Edit - Lol @ disagrees this place is so overrun with PS3 loyalists who would do anything to quell any bad news about it, viva la revolution against the bots! go pc!
How many delusional fanboys are in here? The graphics don't impress visually, sure considering what they are doing with the 256 online they need to make setbacks but it is far from impressive visually. God you Sony fanboys can't just accept ONE exclusive not being better looking than a 360 or PC game sheesh.
I meant in regards to renting servers, but having said that I'm not sure what EA's strategy with this game is. With Battlefield 3 rumoured to be coming out at the end of this year I feel they're going to split the community in half.
EDIT** @Kigmal: 1) Superior aiming 2) Superior graphics 3) More players in the games 4) Community that will actually continue supporting the game (ie playing it 4 years down the track)
Anyone else think this could just be a rewards system after Halo matches? EG use cash to purchase weapons for multiplayer. Bungie don't have experience with MMO's so I don't see why they would?
I dislike DLC, it should be free like it was and occasionally still is on PC. Console gamers complain that PC gamers complain too much but we used to have all of these before consolers caved in and now we're all worse off.
Only PS3 exclusive in top 20 is at number 20 and for such a good quality game its a real shame. Sony really need to market their games better.
Lol MAG is easy anyways all you do is sit and camp. Ever heard of Aion or even Age of Conan? Yep MMO's do this on a much larger scale and with much better graphics. Sorry but for 256 players sure it looks ok far from bad but compared to something like Bad Company 2 which will probably be modded to have up to 128 players its pretty lame, decent for consoles though.
@Foliage I own a PC which floors even the PS3's best game uncharted 2 with great graphics and still large players wh...
Dont go on about gamer zone when every comment you stealth troll anything bar the ps3.
Anywhom Bayonetta is a great game (at least on 360 according to reviewers) so pick it up!
Those graphics are amazing in the cutscenes, really looks like the beta and full release!!!! ..... /s
I think he doesnt like it because some games just aren't made for 3d imo.
**Edit**
Alternative reply to PS3 loyalists - he just hates it because its on PS3 hes so biased microsoft paid him off
In other news Nvidia has 3d enable on many games for Windows.
"Bayonetta is one of the finest actions games I've ever played as long as we're talking about the XBOX360 Version."
Once again Modern Woefare strikes.
ENB doesnt even work on 3/4 of the people that have GTA just crashes the game, if your lucky enough to get it working its good though!
How many delusional fanboys are in here? The graphics don't impress visually, sure considering what they are doing with the 256 online they need to make setbacks but it is far from impressive visually. God you Sony fanboys can't just accept ONE exclusive not being better looking than a 360 or PC game sheesh.
I meant in regards to renting servers, but having said that I'm not sure what EA's strategy with this game is. With Battlefield 3 rumoured to be coming out at the end of this year I feel they're going to split the community in half.
EDIT**
@Kigmal:
1) Superior aiming
2) Superior graphics
3) More players in the games
4) Community that will actually continue supporting the game (ie playing it 4 years down the track)
same as bf2, lame title seeking hits
"Speaking to VideoGamer.com, producer Gordon Van Dyke said no game can claim to better the graphics seen in Naughty Dog's Uncharted 2."
Consoles yes but PC no - Crysis still reigns supreme
Anyone else think this could just be a rewards system after Halo matches? EG use cash to purchase weapons for multiplayer. Bungie don't have experience with MMO's so I don't see why they would?
The graphics are good but not Uncharted 2 worthy although they add in destruction so thats a plus
I dislike DLC, it should be free like it was and occasionally still is on PC. Console gamers complain that PC gamers complain too much but we used to have all of these before consolers caved in and now we're all worse off.
And these couldnt just come out on XBLA why?
Jenny Craig: Fat people will love diet cake, somehow I dont think this will ring true either.