them and every other dev isn't going there for piracy (sure its a reason but a small one)
there going there for the money. Pc gaming always has and got the game and a long line of support from devs and free dlc..
now with consoles you can charge for dlc and bring out a new game the next year and no one bats an eyelid, look at COD games.
and if anyone cared about benchmarknig they wouldn't use crysis but use 3Dmark or something.
I agree with that, we need better ways to do things. (were seeing easier ways to do AA ETC )
I disagree that gears3 looks good, its nice but so much brown... yucky.
Still game anyone :)
ye i get a free hat.
meh, my sennheiser HD 595's are perfect, ill pass.
wow. ok.
I think the 360 is up there just to show a what it is, not to compare and laugh at the console's.
And 90% of pc games are badly optimised. look at black ops couldn't (and still in some case's) run on AMD/ATI systems. GTA 4 gets used more like a benchmark than a game due to it sucking resources.
and its lazy dev's faults, sure its hard to optimize when person A has a different cpu than person B but what we end up getti...
can I ask what's the problem?
If its about seeing the enemy well there's a thing called being aware of your surroundings. and if its campnig well BF is an objective type game.
Ok one of the main selling points is graphics but just look at them, and the lighting and animations are the best out right now!!!
but the destruction is meant to be a lot better than BC2 ( I hope its not as scripted as Bc2 ;/ )
the thing people don't understand is Bf2 is one of the best FPS out there, BC2 was fun but it was nothing like BF2.
and he calls them lazy as there using the same engine and formula for at least 5 cods(including the...
i would of agreed with you black like a year ago but now with the frostbite engine 2 and cryengine3 ( and the new updates to the UE3) I think we can all agree that consoles are holding us back.
i hope to see something at E3, even just an announcement.
trroy. you are right these features are obscure but DX11 isn't only about these fancy features that are pointless and wasted time to really put them into the game. DX 10/11 are also good as they are easier to code then DX9 ( i read it somewhere so i am probably lie-ing and making a fool out of myself XD )
And if everyone Stayed on XP and DX 9 , were does innovation come from? we need to advance and may it be a silly feature at a time so be it.
also
they said from the start that it was going to be no DX9 support.. old news!!!
and i am glad means that they can put more resources into making the game better!!!!
you get what you pay for. and i think ati's GFX cards have less cons TBH.
@sarcasm
your name makes me thingk you may be talking poop but, kepler was mean to be realeased in 2011, right?? and fermi 2009??
but ohh wait, fermi was delayed big time so i am sure kepler will be to and ati should have anew batch of cards on there way.
sure im not 100% sure but thats the most logical assumption
with this new pay thing comeing in
not only do we get hit with a song which is going to bore me to death, we also have to pay to play online, rock band looks that more tempting
this song list is so weak.
it has more than 1 song from 1 band (which isnt appealing)
and some song choice's are crap.
i was going to get this for drums since i got gh3 guitar but now im having second thoughts
lol i watched that program once, and it was 'american' if you will.
Everything was OTT and to be honest the players were low-med.
i seen them playing css and they couldnt kill for crap,
there low-med players, nothing great.
woot, im going to college to become a programmer.... oh w8, we get treated like 5hit *crys* :'(
thats like the only fps coming out for wii and i can see cod5 being crap like most fps on wii
i guy in college set up a 360 pirating shop, were someone would bring in there 360 and 20 minutes later it was ready to play pirated games.
i know more people who pirate games on console than do pc.