The intent of the legislation if to restrict to whom the speech can be directed (which is, itself, a form of limiting the speech). It's in turn legislating a thing already done by the industry in a way that sets an uncomfortable precedent not only for games but for other media. To concede (falsely) that games are pollutants devalues the products being created by game developers, and is frankly, a dangerous concession that would allow for games to be further marginalized.
The intent of the legislation if to restrict to whom the speech can be directed (which is, itself, a form of limiting the speech). It's in turn legislating a thing already done by the industry in a way that sets an uncomfortable precedent not only for games but for other media. To concede (falsely) that games are pollutants devalues the products being created by game developers, and is frankly, a dangerous concession that would allow for games to be further marginalized.