CowbopBeboy

I'm sorry, but it isn't "near perfect." It's P2P, connection drops happen all the time and it doesn't even have a lobby system. It's as basic as possible, and even in this minimal state it's got a whole bunch of problems.

*every competent online multiplayer service has.

Nah, check the end of the article.

Great review!

The article doesn't focus upon that tweet. It points out another one in which he tells a woman she is "c***fused." Feel free to continue to jump to these conclusions, though, even though anyone can take two minutes to read the article and see that you're completely incorrect.

When he told a woman that she was "c***fused," she had not said anything even close to approaching that insult beforehand.

As mentioned in a previous comment, it was a cumbersome title so it was edited. That isn't exactly the focal point of the piece - the 2,000 words beneath it explains the argument.

Or maybe not everyone was gushing with praise about Uncharted, and criticisms of the game are just as valid as any other opinion even if they don't align with your own?

The use of successor, while still correct given that Uncharted 4 did succeed The Last of Us in Naughty Dog's library of games, was a little cumbersome so we replaced it. Also, it's only a headline - the 2,000 words beneath the headline outlining the article's arguments are more worthwhile than a title.

Successor as in the next Naughty Dog game. Obviously not the next The Last of Us game.

I'm having issues where articles I've posted aren't showing up on N4G whatsoever, yet if I go to resubmit them they show up as pending, despite no one other than myself being able to view them.

So you're saying that no one should criticise any game, and that they should instead go out and make their own game? So, say if I was a little disappointed in The Force Awakens, I should go out and make my own Star Wars? Where do I even start with how dumb this idea is?

I can't believe that you edited this comment and it still looks like this.

Only they're not black.

Maaaaybe. But the character featured in the first example has a completely different facial structure, which would suggest that isn't the case.

So we should never criticize any video game ever again? Right you are.

I know right? Such a weird thing to change.

Yeah, this is what is pointed out by the article.

The Machinima/Xbox One deal was actually the result of an investigation and deemed unethical, though, which makes it a little different. The article does cover YouTubers and their sponsorship deals, though.

Um, yes, this is referenced in the article.