Good to see another good review from a site i've heard of.
I have no idea what site this. Let's wait for more reviews. I'm not expecting 9's so im good
Your talking out of your ass.I doubt you've played the game and are regurgitating what fools are saying on this site. Play it thoroughly before you talk.
An actual story that actually sounds intresting.
THat bothered me too. They said it was fixed in the real game so we'll have to wait and see.
Can you read?
"But then you end up with the 'Marmite effect'; it would make a lot of people really happy but piss off just as many others. Which group is the majority? Who do you try and please?"
He's saying he wants to make the fans happy, not that the game sux. He saying they didn't want to compromise the fan base
"One of the things that we think about games like inFAMOUS, Prototype and Grand Theft Auto—not to...
Microsoft didnt make that tag line for this article.
That's all I ever hear from CD2 nay-sayers. If graphics aren't eye-poping, the game sucks. I question why I come here sometimes.
I can't get excited about it. I really want to like it but,i look at that then I look at other games, Gears 3 and KZ3 and the gameplay just looks okay. That makes me sad because I love its concept.
Almost no one has played the full game does not know of iteration found in it. Let's wait for reviews. BTW the shooting will be fixed in the full game.
People who play a demo and suddenly, they know everything to game and write off. Some people are so ignorant. This game will be one of the most fun games of the year.
Not bad. I didn't think famitsu was fond of western games.
I like the style of the visuals it sets it's distinct from other games.
That's such a graphic whore comment. Look at Demon Souls it didnt look that great at all but had excellent gameplay.
For good reason too.This was the worst review I read in months. So many factual errors.The writer blatantly states that it's a cover based shooter but there is barely any cover. Are you kidding me. It's not a cover based shooter and was specifically stated to not have cover. He said the transforming has almost no use, That is the furthest from the truth. This was utter garbage of a review. I've never seen such neglect on review in my life.
In context of the WFC itself, having played it for several hours, those complaints do not hold up IMO.
He's a good reviewer and someone how appreciates polish and detail which this writer from gamespot apparently does not.
I can't see how this got a 6.5 their complaints weren't all that valid.
I love this game. The higher scores will be because people are familiar with g1 canon and in can see the staggering detail paid to the fiction in this game.
most people here just call it utter trash and flame it. It's nice to read a comment with some one politely saying it's not their kind of game.