I owned a Neo Geo, the cartridges were $200 a piece too. As for Scorpio, I agree, $399-$499, anything more is commercial suicide.
Rainslacker, you've come to your own conclusion by twisting Spencers words into the most negative scenario. I don't agree with what you have written, there is a market for new AAA games, indie games and subsciption services. I don't see any one replacing another and don't have the negative view of the industry that you're pushing.
I reiterate, if MS brings services to the industry and gamers don't like them, they won't pay and it will die. I&#...
Your point is moot because MS have already found out what happens if you don't do what gamers want. Whatever model they choose and whatever delivery methods they offer via Xbox, if they mess it up gamers vote with their wallets. It is a great optional service for new Xbox gamers who can't afford a constant flow of new games, if you don't like it don't buy it.
Indyman77, where does he say he supports it? He is talking about the way gaming is going in general. Get a grip buddy.
Todays dumbest comment.
In percentage terms it's the same number, but in terms of the actual power it is not the same difference. That's why percentages are misleading.
Ohhhhhhh, wonder why your're here trolling again.....
S2Killinit - yours is as much a stretch of the truth as the OP's. Don't let the truth get in the way of your downplay buddy.
Iras, as soon as you start talking percentages you have lost the argument. What would you prefer, 40% of £100 or 40% of £10,000? But they're both 40% right?
You don't even know what a shill is otherwise you would realise your sentence is dumb.
You angry too bro? Seems a lot of people from the other camp hopeful Scorpio will be dead on arrival. Seems you got triggered
Seems someone is worried about the power of Scorpio.
Interestingly you normally talk about games, games, games. Xbox owners are not being left behind in the most important aspect of console ownership. Instead you pick on the niche areas of HDR and VR. Sure they should have made the XB1 more powerful so HDR and VR would work better, but the console was designed 5 years ago and simply doesn't have the power. It is right to criticise MS for this lack of foresight but it can't be changed. You are not fragmenting the player base because...
Yeh, 'concrete possibility' is hilarious. Terrible writing but that's the crap we have to read these days.
Xbox One and One S are the same console so if S is supported so is the original XB1
Andrew, your naivety regarding hardware architecture is embarrassing. You are clearly obsessed with Scorpio as you troll every article. Scorpio has you totally triggered but don't worry, you only have 3 years before the next PS hardware release so get used to being second best buddy.
It's still not a fact regardless of how you want to present it. SK constantly trolls Xbox articles yet doesn't care about it. Just calling it for what it is. Personally I couldn't give a shit about sales numbers for any console, doesn't effect my enjoyment of my Pro or One S in anyway.
You don't care about Scorpio yet you post multiple negative comments about it every day. And you haven't posted any facts in this thread, you linked to an article that guessed the cost of building the console. Guessing is not facts. Stop being so childish.
Interesting that you're the one trolling but I'm salty? Another embarrassment. Then you link to an article that is just guessing at the build cost, but that's true facts? More embarrassment. Scorpio has you so triggered it's hilarious.
Who would have guessed that all the known Xbox haters would trash this article. Well done guys, Sony would be proud. SMH