Alot of those DLCs are also overpriced
playing on a gtx 590
calling the PC community a bounch of graphics whores
You realize how BS that sounds?
Anyway, yea I agree the game looks good even on my GTX 260, but its not the graphics that I'm dissapointed about, its that the game fucking sucks and is only 16 hours (if you do every single thing in the game).
Interesting. It seems console players may after all be able to stand toe to toe with PC counter strikers.
But then again, PC counter strikers tend to be ungodly in their skill
I disagree. The game isn't very good even despite the technical issues. It only took me 16 hours to do everything in the entire game. Thats totall bullshit, cuz I was expecting an amazingly deep 20 hour campaign for id and got this half assed game
Hans zimmer is a good music maker but imo his pieces were too overly dramatic for the type of mindless stuff we were doing in the campaign mode.
well...if its a good sequel then by all means I hope it is made, just the same as if it is a good WW2 game, then let it be made. Just because theres a lot of something doesnt mean all of that something is automatically crap
Hold on a second yall, this could be an interesting game...only if you play as will smith tho
idk what kind of garbage multiplayer game this guy is talkin about, but what I play doesnt record your KDR, you dont have a "gamertag" and trick shots DO mean you have skill, there aint no leaderboards, and you dont "aquire endgame equipment".
All of that is pretty much Cod, might as well rename this article top 5 myths about COD skill.
COD skill, now aint that an oxymoronic statement
Moral of the story: so many idiots nowadays see betas synonymous with demos that they think because the beta played poorly, so too will the final product.
All the kiddies are used to preordering a game and getting early access to the demo--er, I mean beta. Its a bullshit excuse of an incentive to preorder a game, and what BF3 did was a true beta test
Because they felt like it and had the free will to do so?
I don't particularly like the idea of tacked on multiplayer component to a traditionally single player only RPG. If they are able to do so, how shallow are the gameplay elements of the game that 4 people can hop in and play a game at once? It has to be seriously dumbed down for stuff like that to happen, and I'm guessing thats exactly what they did to this game
well its just the sort of game that doesnt have iron sights, just like many valve shooters. They just work better without them
Despite its flaws, I think MW3 will be a good game as its predecessors have been
it got scrapped cuz its fucking retarded. Thats what happened to it
at least Mw3 doesnt have a glitchy garbage beta like BF3 which is how the actual game is gonna be like
Do they think this will stop anything? There are always work-arounds for pirates for games that have DRM.
forgot the half life 2 reference with the "pick up that can" authority guy
oh cool it gives avatar outfits for 2 people who werent even in the original comic
idk what they were thinking giving that pulse chaingun thing to the player near the end of the game. Seriously that was my favorite weapon to use and I only got to use it for 10 minutes, literally, for the last mission only. you dont even get to use all the ammunition you get for it either; the end mission enemies are all pushovers and it completely lacks a final boss, just hordes of badguys who die in 2-3 shots to the chaingun. This just shows very poor balancing and gameplay development on ...
Dont even bother guys...beta is lame and so to will the game be