morning,i just watched the harvester of sorrow video on eurogamer,and to be fair from that video of gameplay looks far from perfect,the graphics look above average,but nothing groundbreaking...another massivly over hyped game then,great...
what about kz2?u2(goty?)infamous?r&c? and of course god of war 3?if you cannot see these games as having great graphics then you sir need to go to spec savers...said this in other posts,great graphics DO NOT make for a great game...if you really believe this is going to destroy ANY ps3 exclusive graphicly you obviously do not own or by the sound of it have ever played any ps3 exclusive.do yourself a favour,go buy one...it'll blow you away.off out into the sunshine now,leave the ill inform...
agreed max payne was a great game(one of the best if you ask me)still thats not really answering my question tho...silent hill had crap the pants moments.as for best graphics scince crysis?no,have to disagree there,as this is a console game,crysis only looks nice and runs smoothly on expensive gaming rigs...id like to know more about the game i.e plot storyline.as to me this makes or breaks a game.so same question really,how does it redefine this genre?because i really cant see it...as for ga...
good old disagree button, thanks for infoming me about the gameplay as this is all that really matters to me...so i guess i'll just keep on reading all this mines better than yours BS.i for one do not care if the games 540p,720p,1080i or even 1080p...i want to know what this game does soooo much better than other survival horror games.after all thats all it is.no?
@kazu0 mate take off your 360 goggles,stupid comments like that are completely unfounded.i can think of a whole list of ps3 games that(from what weve seen)look better,even some multiplatform games look better than this...this games been in development for 5 years better games have been and gone in that time,even with development of new game engines,i fail to see this game as ground breaking for the time spent on it,can anybody tell me what GAMEPLAY elements this games got to set it apart from...
the game looks good,however that does not mean its not now a linear point A-B alitd or siren clone,all i hope(and really do)is it delivers on gameplay.what videos ive seen of aw really doesn't seem to be doing anything special at all.been there and done that a hundred times before.disagree with that???fine.but why so much hype over a game thats not in my mind bringing anything new to US gamers???
sounds like a terrible plot,but hey played a hundred games with worse storylines.which game engine is this game using?am i right in thinking its the unreal engine?if it is,hows it going to be"groundbreaking"?? ?poor old tired engine,its not done groundbreaking for a while.
well games like ,mirrors edge,lbp.bioshock,all three of these games bought something new to there genre,i mean first person racing,create play share,and a thinking mans fps...now please tell me what aw does that previous games in the exact same genre have not already done,because from the videos ive seen,it doesnt look like much.yeah it looks nice but that does not make a game good...
oh dear,this will be a terrible mistake,the 3rd person mode in mw2 sucked balls,now there going to make it into a whole game???after the shabby/glitchy/broken multi playier in mw2 i for one have lost all faith in this series...that,and with moh,and graw both around the corner,i hope the cod series gets knocked back to being the underdog.right back to battlefield...
@omega serious...your kidding right?thats the most ill informed thing ive read here today,almost as ignorant as people saying rrod has been cured...on topic,thanks for the disagrees,but still looks like boring gameplay to me,sorry but i call massive overhyping on alan wake...just looks generic and boring...but hey xbox fans need something to cling to.best graphics?dont think so....
lol at all the blatent fanboys here...yeah it looks like a pretty game,but at the same time does(from the videos ive seen)not seem to be doing anything new at all.just a pretty alone in the dark game...hope it turns out better than that,but just looks like a shiny version of aitd to me...sorry if the xbox fans see something different,i cant tho,please enlighten me...houses bumping into alan and he remains upright???come on?so pretty game,average gameplay from what ive seen...and i dont see ho...
the trouble with mw2 is the sniper rifles are far to easy to get kills with...noob easy infact.compared to the sniper rifles on bfbc2 where the bullets actually drop over distance,also the fact that if you are getting shot by a sniper(repeatedly) you can tag them for all the team to see.not sure why mw2 did not include such a feature?all said and done its not camping thats put mw2 on the shelf to gather dust for me,but the total lack of working as a team,hardcore team deathmatch,for example,s...
whats going on here then???i watched the daytime video,and now its been removed???either way the video showed nothing groundbreaking at all,GAMEPLAY,is that not what GAMES are about???this(from the videos ive seen)really aint bringing anything new to the table gameplay wise.at no point did i think to myself"hummm,wish i was playing that."looks pretty,but thats about it...
they've taken down a link/story of the outdoors gameplay...i watched it,now its gone???anyway nothing groundbreaking at all in that video.game looks average to me,graphics look good,but gameplay...seen it all before.xbox overhyping again...we'd better wait for the reviews tho eh?
sorry looks completely average to me in that video.absolutely nothing groundbreaking at all...
hang on...the link to this is just another website,and a chopped up sentence from a community manager?and THIS is fact???this games getting WAY too overhyped,
good news for the xbox indeed,just hope the sp is longer than 5 hours,still looks like alone in the dark/silent hill to me tho...
morning,seems funny all this,the previous splinter cell games probably(if speed ran)weren't much longer.think about it,in all the previous games it encouraged players to wait/watch the movements of the enemy,where this game encourages you to move thu levels quickly
see all the other sh*te eurogamer put up on there site.i.e tons of ms adverts,and yet this sites NOW bias towards the ps3???sounds like an over hyped game to me.(again)i dot like it,you may have guessed...but come on,action shooter that feels mediocre,anything over that 7 is questionable if you ask me(which your not),and is stepping into the genre of other great games that do this soooooo much better...so 7 sounds average to me.only on (over hyped)xbox...haha.
well i can't believe any official xbox website would allow such an article to be published,im not going to argue any of the points this fanboys trying to make,as most of it is unfounded rubbish.think this really shows the mentality of ms as a company tho,constantly throwing mud at the competition,say what you like about fanboys,but this ones way off the mark.thanks ms for the 3 xboxes i went thu...but im now happier with my playstation 3.