Ps3 comes with a blue ray player, 360 doesnt.. everything else is the same... and ps3 has more games, and a more stable online service, with dedicated servers... so i guess ps3 wins by a landslide.
review by a real gamer, not a paid corporate company.
I have little big planet, not resistance 2 though, i never liked resistance. i have 13 games now though, 14 next week when killzone 2 comes out.
the only exclusive game on that list is left 4 dead, and it's probably a good game, but i really don't care about zombie games at all.
lastly, there is no games coming to your system in the future, which is the point. you can list sales from vgchartz if you want, but they are inaccurate, they just take microsofts word for it...
I wouldn't trust their words if someone paid me, so few good people left in this world.
Where's all the games? i/d be more mad at microsoft if i were you, all you have is 7/10 games for quarter 1 and beyond.
If the only things that come out of a site are anti ps3 articles, you can bet they are bias, no matter the guise they put on.
8.0 from ign, means it's meh, not worth playing... maybe a rent sometime, but if you don't like rpgs, you wouldn't even want to do that.
not going to introduce anyone to rpgs with this crapfest.
Counterstrike wasn't even made by them, but they took it over with steam, every kid in every college/university was playing that game, and a lot of them still do.
Half life was sub par then, and it's sub par now, it's counter-strike that won gamers hearts, they are taking pride in someone elses work, that fat guy is pathetic.
You can barely tell the difference graphically, the controls are far superior on the ps3, and the 360 still wins? i don't think this site likes to say ps3 wins ever.
As for the install, who has a ps3 and doesn't have 2gb for the game they are playing? they come with 80 gigs, the loading issue is a wash, considering you can install it. why do i get the feeling if the 360 was the one that could install and match the loading times, they would have called it a tie...
Al...
This is a duplicate ehhh
So only anti ps3 articles are considered top news? the exact same article for anti 360 has higher degree's than 2 stories on there, but because it's anti 360 it isn't allowed on top news? pshh, ookkkkk, biased n4g.
It's a perfect score from the l.a times, what more do you want? seriously?
But then why not just make it on like 10 disks? so it can be in 720p like final fantasy 13?
Maybe it will go the same way alone in the dark went, it was on 360 first, and the port was wayyy better on the ps3, same for bioshock.
It depends on whether they use the ps3's true power or not, and more and more companies are learning to do it.
But i still won't call it a gaming console...
hopefully nintendo uses the money to make an actual gaming console next time around, and not a kiddy toy.
But you all know it's going to copy every single thing 360 has, and add more stuff by the time 3.0 comes out.
so it doesn't really matter if this one is fake or not, 3.0 will add these things and more.
that in game browser thing aside that is.
That is a dumb question btw, obviously you can't buy anything in killzone, it's not the sims.. geez lol
that's what home's for, ehhh
Oh wait, it got a 7/10.... i guess, it's a flop... but that's ok
At least you can still play it, and pretend it's a ps2 game, it's graphics look about the same.
They aren't allowed to talk about it until the contract with microsoft is up though, which is quarter 3 this year.
Everyone knew halo wars would suck from day one, if it was halo 3's expansion that was getting 7/10-8/10, the 360 fans would cry bias for 50 or more pages, they are the worst of fanboys, but lucky for them microsoft gives 1000 dollar swag bags to reviewers, and puts them in high class hotels to review the games.. i doubt they'll be able to afford that much longer though...
that aside, game quality is debatable, but you have to ask yourself one thing, would gta 4 have gotten all 1...