except these are 3rd party drives that other companies will also produce and compete with. The prices will go down and go on sale frequently.
And they likely bought Housmarque and Bluepoint for even less than Insomniac.
@thesoftware730
That's a terrible comparison. One PS5 model isn't supposed to be a successor/update for the other...
They are twiddling their thumbs. Over 600 days since the last major AAA 1st party game
these batteries last at least 15 years. Hardly a big deal considering no significant amount of people will be playing PS4 when PS7 is out
Rent Free
Looks like it was made in Dreams
How much overlap would an Astro game have with a Sackboy game? In terms of game play
Regardless of whatever the narratives are, on pure inflation alone, a $60 game back in 2006 would cost $77.46 today. We're pay LESS for a game today than we did 15 years ago.
@TheEngigma313
Using a little research....
In 2006 $60 is = to $77.46 in today's money.
You'll laugh in my face and then what?
@morganfell, Can you point to where I said critics are correct? You're putting words in my mouth. I used Days Gone as the example of a game not scoring high but still being good which alludes to critics being wrong. Which means I'm saying the reviewers won't be dishing out 9s and 10s but Returnal will still be a good game to play. A 71 is a critical flop for a Sony first party. Again, I'm literally saying Returnal will be a good game but you and others here don't like the ...
I see the nuance of what I posted went above you and everyone else who replied to me. You do realize there are plenty of games that flop critically but are still good games to play? I'm saying the mainstream critics won't eat this up like they do big name games most of the time. Thank you for the insults.
of course. But this is another Days Gone at best. See above. Thank you for the insult.
I can see this game flopping critically
"But don't you, like, all have mobile phones?!?!"
bye
Phil's a master at finessing the naive
More like LamePass
in your opinion