Developers need to make the PS3 the lead platform so both games are the same. This has been done with plenty of titles already.
But I don't understand why it's so important to play count the pixels while you're playing.
Btw, I want to add that this was a good read as well. Some interesting points especially.
Why are you so offended by people laughing at it? If you're hurt by people laughing about it, then you're the one that needs to grow up.
I don't see anything that's revolutionary about Kinect. All I see is a company wasting time and money on a motion control that barely works when they should be using it more wisely.
Of course people are going to laugh.
Who are you fooling? Really? If this game remained exclusive, Square wouldn't have taken that content out.
That was funny as hell Clizzz. xD
...Your point being?
I don't mind games being pushed back because this year is chock full of multiplatfoems as it is. Should I mention games on the 360 that were pushed back as well? Really?
Please stop trolling.
I played the demo and should be getting the game soon but this is not GOTY material.
Bring this game to the U.S!
I loved Samanosuke. I remembered the first Onimusha game. The music was so damn epic. Onimusha 3 had epic music too, including Michelle's theme.
ONIMUSHA 5 CAPCOM. Come on damn it! I'll replay all the Onimusha games if you do that huge favor for me.
...Again, why are we comparing the Wii to the Move/Kinect? The Wii does not need saving. It's a console. Move and KInect are motion controls.
Kiby's Epic Yarn is too adorable for words though. I really want a Wii for that game.
They never said that. People aught to read the comment first before assuming that's what they said.
“First and foremost, I think we have a world-class engine team,” Ted Price, Insomniac Games boss told EGM magazine in a recent interview (via Gamesthirst). “In particular, they focus heavily on using the PS3′s SPUs more effectively (in my opinion) than anyone else in the business.”
What does sales have to do with the topic?:
EXPLAIN.
Whenever someone criticizes Microsoft, you guys bring up the sales argument. That's all you have? Really?
I'd rather have the PS3 in 3rd place if it means getting some really good exclusives to play.
Oh great Microsoft. Spend money on DLC that's coming to the PS3 one way or another!
Wow, just wow.
I sense some serious anger issues here.
No, because Sony actually spends money on *games*. There's nothing wrong with advertising Kinect but don't you think that's too much money?
WHO IS DAMAGE CONTROLLING?
Why would someone damage control over an ad campaign? People are just saying that Microsoft should have spent that money on some first party studios and games at least.
Wow...really.
Thanks for missing the point guys. You really made my day. :/
My point is that FFXIII would have been a better game if it was exclusive to the PS3. If Versus goes multiplatform, it will be the same nonsense we dealt with since FFXIII. Again, the PS3 version sold better. Why is Square going to make Versus multiplatform when it made too many mistakes with FFXIII?
I don't play sales but I don't see their logic at this point.
Anyway I...
...If Square makes a stupid decision like this, then we'll know for sure they've REALLY lost their minds. Which version of FFXIII sold better again? Oh, that's right, the PS3 version.
I want a proper FF game with towns and other content. If content has to be cut for the sake of making them the same, then that's not fair at all. I don't mind multiplats but when you have to sacrifice space for the imperfections of another console, it gets under my skin.
....Just wow.
I think he is. =/
I must be missing something. I could have sworn more exclusives than just GOW III came out for the PS3...
And by the way Applegate, GOW is worth the replay because it's a damn good game.