thats funny
dont use no double negatives
im going to give it a miss, it is more of the same which to me does not justify a full price purchase.
im tryin to forget about those ones.
Im willing to bet there are plenty of other rapists out there who have never even played GTA
thats right, the analog sticks are in a bad place. it is uncomfortable to play an fps (for me, i know not all hands are the same size)
i see that the textures appear to have more depth.
the roads look much nicer
This is an article about games for grown ups
looks great
unlike my chances of been able to run it!
i can run crysis warhead at 1920 x 1200 in a mix of gamer & enthusiast settings, i get about 30 - 40 fps
but i can't enable AA
im happy with my single 4870, i can run fallout at 1920 x 1200 on max detail with 4 x AA.
i still get a silky smooth framerate.
i can't max crysis though or it turns into a slide show.
mmmmmmm, i want to do rude things to gemma
more of the same, yawn
i was only making sure!
do you have 360 or pc version?
you sure? it says in the manual that completing the main quest does not mean the end of the game
previous x games were too complicated for me.
i prefer dark star one. i know its not as in depth but i find it more fun
its not as good as license to kill on the spectrum!
agreed, my sounds like a washing machine.
much too loud for watching movies on
oops, i clicked disagree before fully reading your post.
sorry
I think 7.5 is a fair score.
The game offers nothing new and is not worth £39.99 IMO.
It is still only 6v6 on team hardcore, other game modes are 9v9 so why 6v6 for hardcore?
I can play 20v20 hardcore on pc