I'm getting the game cos it seems quite very worth ..
but no way it sets graphic benchmark come on..
do you see the graphics? is blurry all around
who gives a f about the order?
it's nice to see a clickbait 6 out of 10 article on top of n4g page hot things... whereas the game is collecting a fulltruckload of 8 9 and 10s
true
it may be the ps4 has a quite big pixel count difference .. anyhow trust me is not that noticeable through playin both (at least on my tv .. have a 40' tv , maybe on larger screen ..i dont know,, ) have hard time sayin one version looks clearly better then the other seriously
btw i cant play them side by side but no way 790p on xb1 .. lines are very sharp .. curves too ..graphic is sharp ( and very well made.. )
but then i know 720p not 790p ..
720+overall blurry scenes ( this game is far from "sharp" )..
it's a new benchmark?
someone is defn drunk
videogame sites and review medias have completely lost control
people need to think it's bad , clickbait , ms paid etc..to survive
in fact .. but you know ..biased readers
is full of 9 and some 10s out there buddy
the art design and graphics are very good . first stage ( nature ) as well as the big room as well as the citadel are a pleasure for the eyes ..overall crafting is very high quality
no issues on framdrop here ...wonder what the people is talking about ....
xb1 and ps4 look quite close btw... not that sure the ps4 version looks better... at least on my tv
overall a very good demo that showcases what theyr designing and doing , besides not being a FF fan , i h...
Ive just played both .. there's no much difference seriously .. wonder what you are talking about
its hard that half life 3 will please every fan . its real the RDR2 gameply will be nearly photoproof.. or cgi/like.
problem is the 60fps .
I cant wait for RDR2 as everyone who played the first .. and would be happy to be surprised by an incredible HL3 release .. but that game must be league beyond expectations to deliver imo ... cant come up as a mainstream good looking&good story shooter . all imho .
I can only say good things playin on xbox the game is very good
I'm gald they developed it on xb1 ..and really very happy I can play it ...the graphics are def good .. close up to character and to things is super ..
played only ds1 on ps3 and this game feels faster then ds1 .but familiar , freaking + senso of depth , and freaking good from the beginning .
The graphics are outstanding .
the game is more of the same , it seems so , nevertheless upg...
me too i liked both 5 and 6
never looked nudities/manga? mm you likely live on an asexuated planet
i don't know how you like it . me not very much . worse that i read remedy written 100% game was 1080p for xb1 . but i was dreaming likely
and it looks SUPER-unsharp . extra soft . in fact .
the problem is i have an xbox , i don't want to buy and exclusive advertised as an esclusive (not anymore) running at 1080p ( not anymore ) , and i dont think a next gen advertised super-exclusive should land at 720p.
720p is a graphic i'm used and accept on 360.
i won't live happy with a 2016 exclusive for x1 @ which has been ultra-advertised as a magnificient title .....and in the end it runs 720p
wtf are they kiddin on me or ...
why did not they ...
yeah ..before that i play manic miner on Spectrum 48k .. lovely .. ok
i'd like next gen games on my next gen console
@lastking clean your eyes ..the graphics are good..ok.. but far from sharp ..we re next gen , i DONT LIKE and dont want soft graphics .. that's what i expect from 360 +AA not from my x1 .. in fact forza and halo are sharp smooth and very playable ( 1080 there 60fps too )..
I'm not complaining by a number , 720 or 900
I complain that graphics are sub par resolution wise , and if you check it shows very well , they'r good but far from precise ... there's a nice o...
good time to own both consoles