Considering that the president of Terminal Reality tried to compare the PS3's SPU's to the 360's cores, should have been your first warning that he is completely full of SH@T.
He attempted to say the PS3 has 7 processors while the 360 has 3. Any person with half a brain, or the slightest bit of hardware knowledge knows that each SPU is similar to a THREAD, not a Core. Therefore its more like 5 360 threads (1 used for OS) compared to 6 PS3 SPU's (one locked, and one used for OS)....
You guys keep commenting on how they said "The team is targeting to create an equal experience on both the 360 and the PS3".
You keep insinuating that making 'an equal experience' will RESULT in a compromised PS3 version. But you guys are looking at it from the wrong perspective.
You keep thinking that the PS3, is the worlds best console, when clearly it is not.
WHAT THEY ARE SAYING IS, the game will not be compromised on the 360, it will simpl...
GT5 looks absolutely terrible. I just took that "gt5 vs real life" quiz, and i got 12/14. The only problem i had, was all of the pictures were incredibly CLOSE UP, and others were poor quality. Forcing me to determine which SHINY DOOR looked real vs which SHINY DOOR looked fake. As we all now, refraction and reflection has been something video cards can do realistically for a decade now. So comparing car to car is pointless. You need to compare the entire look of the game. It is as ...
The PS3's memory is MORE limited, than the 360's memory. The PS3's memory caps out at 256mb, while the 360's unified memory allows it to use more, if more is available. So i am confused by your post. Unless you are talking about memory on disk, but even if you are, this doesn't change the fact that the amount of textures on screen is limited by the RAM.
However, if i were to humor you. Aren't texture recycled in the real world as well? Don't trees have similar textures, as well ...
And in other news, MGS4 looks good.
Seriously, out of all of the games you have to chose from, you are going to give merit to MGS4's graphics?
I have played this game for hours on end, and it is abundantly clear to me that its graphics are nothing special. I think it is insulting the intelligence of all gamers to try and say this game couldn't be recreated on the 360. That's like saying pong couldn't run on the NES.
There is literally nothing about MGS4...
You PS3 fans are annoying.
Gears, witch was developed using a PC, and not specifically for the XENOS nor the XENON presents with graphics like this
http://image.com.com/gamesp...
http://news.filefront.com/w...
Which are amazing. Yet you PS3 fans st...
@ PistolPumptMonk, thats a very CONTRIVED and conceited view.
The PS3 isn't a multimedia powerhouse. In fact, most people would agree that the 360 takes that title. It has a far better multimedia experience and a larger movie, show, arcade, and music library than the PS3. Not to mention its ability to run Windows Media center.
The only REAL difference between the consoles (without arguing GRAFIX) is that the PS3 has a Blu-ray player. America has clearly shown that it...
This article is stupid, and its wrong. The main reason multiplat games look better on the 360 is not due to lazy developers. It is due to hardware.
The PS3 has alot of potential IF, and only IF, games are designed specifically for its hardware. However, games designed for multiple platforms take advantage of different resources.
For example, the RSX cannot do AA, AF, and texturing as well as the XBOX 360. Therefore, on nearly any multiplat game the 360 has the edge. ...
I'm gonna be that 'skeptical XBOX fan'. It looks like it could be fun, but i see some potential problems.
First, delay. There is clearly a .2 second delay (estimate). This just, wont work. If they cannot fix this issue, NATAL is worthless.
Second, movement. It seems that ANY and ALL movements will be picked up by the camera. Therefore, while in front of the camera, you can LITERALLY not make a SINGLE non-game movement. Otherwise, your movement would be 'picked up' by...
You can spin it, flip flop it, decorate it, make it sparkly, or dress it like a clown, but one fact remains.
For the 20'th month in a row, the PS3 has been 'DEAD LAST'. (since it came out).
The Xbox 360 is 'old hardware' and it is STILL, for the 20th month in a row, selling BETTER than the PS3's new hardware. You can blame it on price, you can blame it on quality, games, etc, etc, etc. But the point is that this is BAD for Sony. They have officially lost a HUGE perce...
You guys are stupid. NEITHER OF THESE DAMN GAMES ARE OUT. This means that voting between the two is pointless. In this regard, the vote is simply "which do you think will be better". So i don't really understand how Turn 10's bribes are an issue. It's not like this vote was based on..... ANYTHING..... All they did was 'supposedly' "bribe" fans on some message board in order to gain free publicity from this article. However, if any of you looked at the CNET vote BEFORE Turn...
Clearly, Linuxguru, you are the "type of fan" that the PS3 draws. You use Linux... because you think 'obscurity' and 'uniqueness' are whats important. Clearly, it doesn't matter to you that most game are built, and run better on the Windows format. Considering this is a gaming website, your choice is, in short, stupid.
Thereby your opinion shouldn't be considered. But fortunately for you i am a nice guy. So i will consider it. The same does not apply to "any fanbo...
Ironic, isnt it. That the PS3 fanboys are the ones OBSESSED with hardware, yet the 360 fanboys are the ones that understand how the hardware works. They understand how the hardware in the PS3 works, better than PS3 owners do.
Just goes to show you the "type" of audience, each console has.
Anyways please refer to my post (on Bobbysaget) above. The ONLY REASON "HD" would take up more disk space, is if the textures are HD textures. But the PS3 (RSX)...
I have played both ICO Shadow of the Colossus, WHO HASN'T?
I was just being ironic and funny, it made me giggle a bunch.
PS3 fanboys and 360 fanboys are equally stupid. Somewhere along the way you 'PS2 fanboys' whom had the worst weakest system of last generation all of a sudden decided graphics are paramount. You guys forget that all of us 360 owners... were also PS1/PS2 owners. We just picked the console we like better. If we decide the PS3 is worthwhile, we will p...
You mean, i am gonna miss out on "UBER PUPPY LOVE 2" on the PS3?!
WHY oh WHY did i buy a 360!!!!!
Its almost like how i missed out on "KILL(ed itself) Zone 2" Wow with the 1,000,000,000,000,000 FPS games out there.. what am i going to do without that SuPER SHinY One!
Or how i missed out on Uncharted! because we all know that the 360 definitely doesn't have any AAA 3rd person shooters that require you to take cover!
And this is why simply "googling" the differences between the two consoles isn't sufficient. Maybe you should acquire some experience developing for them.
First things first, the gflop performance for either system is nearly identical. AS EXPECTED the SPU's serve to raise the PS3's "theoretical" flop performance. But DO NOT RESULT in a actual measurable difference. that difference is "tested" in a "pefect" environment, that is not indicativ...
It's amazing how many agrees you get. Article to article, your posts have got to be the most 'passive aggressive', biased, and incorrect on this website. I suppose it just goes to show that ignorance feeds on ignorance. N4G has very little credibility now a days due to its large "PS3 flamebase".
There are several reasons why muliplatform games look better on the 360, and "bad code" is rarely of them. Coding, for the most part, has absolutely nothing to do wit...