I would always prefer to play with players better than me so I can learn and then kick their ass....if you suck go practice.
how are folks disagreeing with your post? It's the right answer.
so then do not play the game???
ITs my number 2 game in the Metal Gear series....just a magnificent game.
smh, Nintendo be wildn' with their prices....most of their games have no business being 59.99 anyways.
That is a pretty darn good list. Number one for me is The Last of US. That is THE GREATEST GAME I HAVE EVERY PLAYED IN MY ENTIRE LIFE ON THE PLANET EARTH IN THE MILKY WAY GALAXY OF THIS UNIVERSE.........
the problem with that is, if you do not like, you cannot return it. Video games don't have that kind of return policy.
yeeeeeea this one I will pass on, a lot of the casual gamers will pick this up though, they are too ill informed and misguided to see the realities. So much for the "Gotta catch 'em all" slogan...NO thanks Game Freak.
This will be rather tough to do....He's SUPERMAN for crying out loud.
I will choose a female character when given the choice, in the past that was mainly the ONLY option. I also love a lady that can kick ass...(Here is looking at you Madam Croft.)
Star Trek is a tough game to make for. Simply because it lends itself to be a RTS kind of game rather than an action based game. More RPG kind of game.
It would be tough to do a star trek action based game, the best one so far to me is Timelines for the tablets and that is more RTS than anything. Star Trek action game would have to be a massive project and the community is strong enough to get into that world.
@illLogic, I have no argument with you on your post, that is completely "Logical" Free 2 play games survive on MT's so I wont be silly nor insult your intelligence to say otherwise, my post was in reference to @CDbiggen's post.
It came across as arrogance because he/she made it personal. Wanting to be a part of the %49 that is contributing (some willingly and others unwittingly) to what most believe is the decline in gaming to a model that will ruin gami...
This game is still being played??? Never even bothered to get to the download screen to see the trailer to purchase the game, I also never bothered to finish reading the advertisements for the game at retail stores, SCREW EA.
you're proud of this I see. Congrats.
Re-read the post from @telekineticmantis...its quite relevant.
Misguided fools....
NO thank you, Game Freak is one lazy ass developer and a disappointment. Failed to deliver.
"I'm not a pokemon addict though" you may think that all you want, that is your prerogative, but your post comes across as an apologist and thus enables the laziness to continue. The slogan for pokemon is "Gotta catch em' all"
Apparently you cannot do that, so what is the point of playing this game?
We need more optimistic people like you @Tross because I have none left for Nintendo and Game Freak. Ultimately the reason we cannot get the pokemon game we all want is due to the limitations of the consoles that Pokemon games are on.
The switch version of the Pokemon should be an open world extravaganza, but I have ZERO confidence with them now, maybe they are just ill equipped but one would have to play the game to find out and one is not paying 65 bucks for a game where...
"Gotta catch 'em all" which is the slogan of Pokemon. In Sword and Sheild, your significantly limited in the pokemon you can catch so gameFreak is controlling what pokemon you can use.
I have played pokemon since red and blue and I am and greatly saddened that in 2019 Sword and Shield is using the SAME FORMULA after ALL these years and also pissed that the first 150 (which are the BEST in my opinion) are not available (WTF???).
So, in realit...